Settlers were constantly taking more land than either they agreed for, or just what didnt belong to them, the Indians would fight back and lose in the end, they would shrink back and find more land, there would be peace for a little while, and then settlers would keep wanting more land
It can be inferred that the details under “Social Upheaval” that supports the idea that “terror and bewilderment” can cause people to respond in unusual or illogical ways is that Social Upheavals s are usually triggered by stringent economic or political conditions.
<h3>What was the
Social Upheaval?</h3>
The term "social upheaval" refers to the disruption of social life in a civilization. War, starvation, economic restrictions, and tougher legal measures can all contribute to it. People will typically take to the streets to protest.
<h3>What was the catalyst for societal transformation in Europe?</h3>
Around 1760, the Industrial Revolution began, and it revolutionized people's social and economic life first in England, then in other European nations, and finally on other continents.
In Europe, several societal transformations occurred, including the Renaissance, the Protestant Reformation, and colonization.
Learn more about Social Upheaval:
brainly.com/question/13391889
#SPJ1
Hey there! I'm happy to help!
A primary source is one that is written by someone who experienced the event firsthand. Anne Frank's diary is an example of a primary source. She was the first (primary) person who experienced what happened on that hierarchy.
A secondary source is one that is written about a primary source. It comes second on the hierarchy of receiving historical information because it has to be based on a primary source, which gives the actual information. A history documentary is an example of a secondary source.
Have a wonderful day and keep on learning! :D
Answer:
This excerpt from document two connects to when the abolition of slavery was truly beginning to happen. Buchanan was a democrat who morally was against slavery but seemed to think the Constitution protected the rights of slave owners. " Should it be refused, then the Constitution, to which all the States are parties, will have been willfully violated by one portion of them in a provision essential to the domestic security and happiness of the remainder" . Buchanan states simply that if the southeners are refused their " rights " to have slaves then the peace that Anti and Pro slavery people, will no longer exist. I am meeting the essay's requirements for contextualization because I am quoting the context directly and using the context to help inform my audience.
Explanation:
This is what I wrote. It may not be right but I'm sure it is. You may want to read over it and edit it so it sounds like you wrote it.
Answer:
"King Ferdinand
" and "Queen Isabella"
Explanation:
King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella, help finance his journey.
