Answer:
True
Explanation:
The term Force majeure is a French term which translates as 'greater force'. It originated in French civil law and is practiced and accepted in many jurisdictions.
The force majeure clause is added in contracts between parties to help remove the liability of unavoidable and natural catastrophes that alter the plans and course of the contract. The occurrences that might be outside the control of either parties include; epidemics, war, conflicts and natural disasters like earthquake and hurricanes.
For events to be force majeure, they must be unavoidable, unforeseeable and external to the parties in the contract.
The two ways that the government can play a role in the economy is by:
- resolve market failures
- protecting property rights
<h3>Why the government intervenes in the economy</h3>
In a state of market inefficiencies the intervention of the government becomes very necessary.
The government tries to take care of the inefficiencies using
- taxation
- subsidies
- regulations
Read more on government intervention here: brainly.com/question/13921660
<span>The British Columbia's Coastal Rainforests is known to be the largest rainforest in the world that has remained temperate. It is located in the Pacific coasts of North America. Based on their records, the human activities that were conducted in these rainforests include logging, mushroom harvesting, hunting, fishing, and industry.</span>
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
