1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Volgvan
3 years ago
12

The value of a certain car, in dollars, x years from its model year can be predicted by the function f(x)=12,000(0.89)x . The va

lue of a certain SUV, in dollars, x years from its model year can be predicted by the exponential function shown in the table.
How much more will the SUV be worth than the car 5 years after their model years?
Enter your answer, rounded to the nearest cent, in the box

x ​g(x)

0 17,000
1 14,280
2 11,995
3 10,076
4 8463.81
5 7109.60

Mathematics
2 answers:
nignag [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: For anyone who needs it this is the correct answer! :)


Step-by-step explanation:


scZoUnD [109]3 years ago
5 0
An exponential decay function is:

f=ir^t, f=final amount, i=initial amount, r=common ratio, t=number of times ratio is applied...We can see the initial value is 17000 so all we really have to find is the common ratio, or "rate" as some call it :P  If we look at the second point, when t=1 we can see:

14280=17000r

r=357/425

r=0.84

So in five years the SUV will be worth more than the car by:

17000(0.84^5)-12000(0.89^5)

$408.73  (to the nearest cent)
You might be interested in
a man's electric bill was $23 less than his gas bill. the 2 utilities cost him a total of $109. find the amount of his gas bill
Maslowich

Answer:$130

Step-by-step explanation: you can find this by using 23 + 109

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Joan's Nursery specializes in custom-designed landscaping for residential areas. The estimated labor cost associated with a part
Gnoma [55]

Answer:

A) Null and alternative hypothesis

H_0: \mu=2\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 2

B) M = 2.2 hours

C) s = 0.52 hours

D) P-value = 0.255

E) At a significance level of 0.05, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the mean tree-planting time significantly differs from two hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the mean tree-planting time significantly differs from two hours.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \mu=2\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 2

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=10.

The sample mean is M=2.2.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=0.52.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{0.52}{\sqrt{10}}=0.1644

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{2.2-2}{0.1644}=\dfrac{0.2}{0.1644}=1.216

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

df=n-1=10-1=9

This test is a two-tailed test, with 9 degrees of freedom and t=1.216, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t>1.216)=0.255

As the P-value (0.255) is bigger than the significance level (0.05), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the mean tree-planting time significantly differs from two hours.

<u><em>Sample mean and standard deviation:</em></u>

<u><em /></u>

<u><em /></u>M=\dfrac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n\,x_i\\\\\\M=\dfrac{1}{10}(1.7+1.5+2.6+. . .+2.3)\\\\\\M=\dfrac{22}{10}\\\\\\M=2.2\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n\,(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{9}((1.7-2.2)^2+(1.5-2.2)^2+(2.6-2.2)^2+. . . +(2.3-2.2)^2)}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{2.4}{9}}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{0.27}=0.52\\\\\\

3 0
3 years ago
2=1/7(-1)+b<br> Solve for b
andrew11 [14]
B=-14

reason:
1/7(-1)*-14
1/7*14
=2
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The probability that the next you meet was born in February. (No leap years)<br><br>​
Alex

Answer:

a. 337/365 or 92.3%

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 365 days in a year.  There are 28 days in February.  So the number of non-February days is 365 − 28 = 337.  The probability that a randomly selected person is not born in February is therefore 337/365 or 92.3%.

3 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me please. I have to show my work.
madreJ [45]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. P = (width + lengh) * 2 = (23 + 10) * 2 = 33 * 2 = 66

  A = width * lengh = 23 * 10 = 230

2. width = 7

 P = (width + lengh) * 2 = ( 7 + 9) * 2 = 16 * 2 = 32

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the slope of the line passing through the points (2, 1) and (4, 31)?
    8·1 answer
  • How many feet is in 2/3 mile long
    14·2 answers
  • Z+6/3=2z/4<br><br> Please solve for z❤️
    13·1 answer
  • How many pairs of whole numbers have sum of 110
    11·2 answers
  • At a store Mary please $34 for 2 pounds of apples 1 pound of berries and 4 pounds of chairs Tom pays $35 for 3 pounds of apples
    15·1 answer
  • LAST QUESTION PLEASEEEE<br> ANSWER ASAP I SUCK AT THIS
    13·2 answers
  • A box contains 421 books. If your teacher orders 19 boxes of books, about how many books will arrive? Use estimation to find you
    13·1 answer
  • Which parametric equations represent y = – |x|? Check all that apply.
    8·2 answers
  • A vehicle purchased for $29,800 depreciates at a constant rate of 4%. Determine the approximate value of
    14·1 answer
  • I WILL MARK BRAINIEST
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!