Answer:
the compensation expense for the year is $327,120
Explanation:
The computation of the compensation expense for the year is given below:
= (Number of stock options to be purchased × (1 - forefeiture percentage) × fair value per option)) ÷ 2
= (87,000 shares × (1 - 0.06) × $8)) ÷ 2
= $327,120
Hence, the compensation expense for the year is $327,120
The same should be considered and relevant too
Yea...... does that question come with a picture? Can u explain better?
The correct answer is - C) planned economies.
The socialist economy type is a planned economy. The planning though is for the whole economy, and it is done by the government officials. This type of economy was witnessed in multiple places around the world, USSR, Yugoslavia, Cuba, China, and more recently in Venezuela, Libya, and North Korea.
In general, this type of economy seems to often have very big problems because of the planning, as it more often than not is mistaken. That has often led to making huge debts, famines, and suffering of the people, and eventually this systems tend to fall apart.
The only exception seems to be Libya, under the rule of Gaddafi, where the economy and the society were thriving, but it was all ruined by a foreign intervention.
The manager such as the CEO
Answer:
The description including its given issue is discussed in the following subsections on the explanation.
Explanation:
The opportunity cost asserts that whenever the quantity of a commodity falls, it's as though the earnings of that same purchaser including its good started going up. The substitution hypothesis notes because as the rate of a decent increase, buyers will replace the cheapest good with products that seem to be comparatively more costly.
Throughout the cases of common goods, the substitution effect becomes negative, meaning that even if the alternative price decreases, the market for the same commodity increases.
Income influence also becomes negative throughout the case of typical goods, i.e., unless the cost of healthy food declines, it implies the buying power Rises because.
If Package of Chewing Gum's price drops, the income as well as substitution result would be the following factors:
- Substitution effect: Chewing cost reduces the market for gum even though it is comparatively cheaper nowadays. Moreover, even though chewing gum, as well as a lollipop, become ideal replacements for one another and, it would provide that customer with the same benefit such that the reduction in price would lead to higher demand.
- Income effect: Benefit of income: reduction in Chewing price change would raise the customer's buying ability because for the same earnings, nowadays the customer will afford more.
Currently, the need for chewing would be increasing due to increased customer productive capacity.