<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
A court assumes that the written cntarct is the begining and the end of all the terms of the agreement and will not acept the parol evidence if it changes the meaning of the terms of contract.
Parol evidence should only be used to determine the inetntions of the parties at the time the contract was made, not after the fact.
Valid contract: The elemenst of valid contract must be seen.
Since Mrs B signed a contract with the specific terms that did not include a bonus, a court would not consider an oral agreement based on completing a yet to be written contract under the parol evidence rule.
hence, Mrs B cannot introduce the oral agreement under the parol evidence rule.
Answer:
Personal greed, Decline of personal ethical sensitivity, the size and structure of governments, economic freedom/openness of economy, Cultural environments that condone corruption, Lack of transparency, Slow judicial processes, etc.
Explanation:
Answer:
$133,000 decrease
Explanation:
The computation of the impact on the operating income is shown below:
Sales for the year $1,052,000
Less:
Variable cost -$862,000
Contribution margin $190,000
Less:
Fixed cost for 30% of $190,000 -$57,000
Impact on the operating income $133,000
This amount reflects the decrease in the operating income
If increased government spending spurs a short-run expansion. The statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
<h3>What is aggregate supply?</h3>
Aggregate supply can be defined as the overall amount of goods and service that a firm intend to produce and supply at a point in time or at a particular period of time.
If an increase in government spending lead to short run expansion this means that there will be shift in aggregate supply of goods and service as aggregate supply will tend to shift to the left.
Therefore the statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
Learn more about aggregate supply here:brainly.com/question/19802257
#SPJ1