Answer:
There are actually 4 principles.
Explanation:
1. All men are created equal (which is not even true because slavery and the treatment of women)
2. All people have basic rights that could not be revoked (Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness)
3. The government has the power to make the decisions
4. When the government doesn't protect its citizen's rights, it can be abolished by the people.
Yes cause he died in 1806 and went to debtors prison in 1798
Specific evidence is there for multiple tsunami events having struck coastal bays of Washington and Oregon is produced by modifications to the sedimentary layer's pattern, the sequential deposit of several layers, salt building up on the peat layer.
How many tsunamis have hit the Oregon coast?
There have been 21 tsunamis to hit the Oregon Coast since 1854. The Great Alaskan Earthquake in 1964 and the Great Tohoku Japan Earthquake in 2011, both of which caused significant damage and four fatalities on the Oregon Coast, respectively, were the causes of the last two destructive tsunamis.
Why do Washington and Oregon get tsunamis?
Subduction zone, deep (Benioff Zone), and shallow crustal fault earthquakes are the three main sources of earthquakes in Washington that have the potential to produce tsunamis.
Learn more about Washington and Oregon: brainly.com/question/8995912
#SPJ4
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
On that day in 1774<span>, British </span>Parliament passes<span> the Boston Port Act, closing the port of Boston and demanding that the city's residents pay for the nearly $1 million worth (in today's money) of tea dumped into Boston Harbor during the Boston Tea Party of December 16, 1773.</span>
