Explanation:
The Intolerable Acts were punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. The laws were meant to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their defiance in the Tea Party protest in reaction to changes in taxation by the British Government.
<u>Answer:
</u>
One limitation on the President's foreign policy power is that he can make foreign treaties but he has to present them in from of the Senate for approval. The branch of government that places this check on the President’s foreign policy power is thus, the United States Congress.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Though the President of the United States serves as the supreme head of the government, the principles of distribution of power and checks and balances are ultimately applied to him too.
- This distribution of power is deemed to be necessary as it prevents an individual from overpowering the majority of officials that work under him.
- Hence, the foreign policy power of the President can thus be deemed to be 'limited'.
The 1st Amendment should help ya out just look them up! They have all the freedoms and even contain to today’s society!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain example (updated by Professor Sandel to the Michael Jordan example) is supposed to illustrate that "liberty upsets patterns and, therefore, the entitlement conception of justice requires illegitimate restrictions of liberty. This applies to justice in holdings and justice in transfer.
American professor Robert Nozick, known for its interesting work at Harvard University, was a justice researcher and theorist who studied libertarian rights and the role of justice in modern society.
In 1974, he wrote the influential book called "Anarchy, State and Utopia," in which he defended the existence of a non-interventional state that granted liberties to citizens with minimal or none interference in the lives of people.
The one different between one of the laws of Hammurabi and one of the laws of the Ten Commandments is the scop. Law of Moses speaks about sin and responsibility to God while the Hammurabian Code does not. The Code of Hammurabi focused on criminal and civil laws and laid out the hard and brutal punishments. Though the Law of Moses talks about justice, it focuses on spiritual laws and personal holiness.
