If everyone were the same, we could be compared to robots. No one would be able to/ want to stand out from the crowd, which would prevent advancements in things like medicine, technology, and science/art in general. No one would be special, so you could argue that nothing would make you significant. If everyone were the same, we would all live to die, because what else would there be to do.
i think the third person omnis2
The option is D. Love isn’t as necessary as and shelter is, but love is very important
If we analyze some of the lines of the poem.
..”<em>Love is not all: it is not meat or drink….
</em>
The author clearly states that love is not necessary to survive or to live.
When the author writes:
”<em> love cannot fill the thickened lung with breath, not clean the blood, nor set the fractured bone yet many a men are making friends with death”</em>
again is saying that love is not necessary to live, however, it is important to the way we live or relate with each other. It is clearly explained that a person can easily live without love. Love is always as an option, a tool, not a vital element in a person's life.
Answer:
D)It introduces the conflict by showing how Bill's wife Tessie reacts to the news and becomes distraught.
Explanation:
Cuz i just done it and got it right, trust me i just done it lol
