1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grandymaker [24]
3 years ago
8

Who smart?? To answer this

History
1 answer:
STALIN [3.7K]3 years ago
5 0
Me bring it on Sr I got this
You might be interested in
Which was a conservative view of government in Europe during the early 19th century?
Gennadij [26K]
Liberalism: When/Where
3 0
2 years ago
How did the king and Parliament view the American colonies?
Vika [28.1K]
D as a source of irritation helps
4 0
3 years ago
Why is it difficult for the public to accurately make judgments about efficiency and waste in bureaucracies given the political
aksik [14]

t is difficult for the public due to red tapism and the fact that the leaders are good at hiding facts.

Explanation:

Red tapism is one of the things that have led many bureaucrats to simply cover up the traces of their questionable deeds in tucked away files that are only revealed after 30 or 40 years.

This makes it difficult for the public to assess them in terms of the information they have as the information that reaches is generally inaccurate and incomplete.

It also has to do with the fact that politicians are constantly trying to save face through PR and also other shady tactics that muddy up the image more.

8 0
2 years ago
The explosion on the USS Maine and yellow journalism contributed to the U.S. decision to go to war against Spain in 1898. What w
Mandarinka [93]

The correct answer is A, as another factor that contributed to the United States decision to go to war against Spain in 1898 was US intention of protect its investments in Cuba.

The United States, which did not participate in the distribution of Africa or Asia and which, since the beginning of the 19th century, was pursuing an expansionist policy, set its initial expansion area in the Caribbean region and, to a lesser extent, in the Pacific, where his influence had already been felt in Hawaii and Japan. Both in one area and another were valuable Spanish colonies (Cuba and Puerto Rico in the Caribbean, the Philippines, the Carolinas and the Marianas and the Palau in the Pacific), which turned out to be easy prey, due to the strong political crisis that shook its metropolis since the end of the reign of Isabella II.

In the case of Cuba, its strong economic, agricultural and strategic value had already provoked numerous purchase offers for the island by several American presidents (John Quincy Adams, James Polk, James Buchanan and Ulysses S. Grant), that the government Spanish always rejected. Cuba was not only a matter of prestige for Spain, but it was one of its richest territories and the commercial traffic of its capital, Havana, was comparable to that recorded at the same time in Barcelona.

To this was added the birth of national feeling in Cuba, which since the Revolution of 1868 had been gaining adherents, the birth of a local bourgeoisie and the political and commercial limitations imposed by Spain that did not allow the free exchange of products, mainly sugar from cane, with the USA and other powers. The benefits of the industrial and commercial bourgeoisie of Cuba were seriously affected by Spanish legislation. The pressures of the Catalan textile bourgeoisie had led to the enactment of the Law of Commercial Relations with the Antilles (1882) and the Canovas Tariff (1891), which guaranteed the monopoly of the textile of Barcelona by taxing foreign products with tariffs of 40% and 46%, and forcing to absorb the production surpluses. The extension of these privileges in the Cuban market settled the industrialization of the Catalan region during the crisis of the sector in the 1880s, nullifying its competitiveness problems, at of the interests of Cuban industry, which was an essential stimulus of the revolt.

The escalation of misgivings between the governments of the US and Spain was increasing, while in the press of both countries there were strong smear campaigns against the adversary. In the midst of this scenario of tension, there was the collapse of the USS Maine, for which the USA blamed Spain. This ended by unleashing the war.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the railroad affect the frontier?
frutty [35]

Answer:

The transcontinental railroad also brought settlers to the frontier. they brought lumber, wood, people, and other necessities. the railroads also brought settlers and miners who laid claim to Native American land. thus, weakening the Native American hold on the west.

i hope this will help you

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was reapportionment?
    15·1 answer
  • Which region of the usa is most sparsely populated?
    8·2 answers
  • Por que ocurrió la división definitiva del partido azul
    13·1 answer
  • I'M STUCK SOMEONE PLEASE HELP! NO COPYING AND PASTING
    6·1 answer
  • 14. Who were the first leaders of the city-states? |
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!
    15·1 answer
  • How did The start of the Great Depression negatively impact those who Saved money during the 1920’s
    12·1 answer
  • How was Pizarri's conquest of the Inca similar to Cortes's conquest of the Aztec?
    14·1 answer
  • Use the excerpt from Jonathan Edwards’ The Great Awakening to answer the question.
    5·1 answer
  • English names for meat have their origins from what country?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!