Answer:
The intrinsic value of the stock is 9.76
Explanation:
We have to use the dividend growth model
It is fundamental to understand that these values are in the future so we must take them to present value, using the required return of 14%
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-&DIVIDENDS&PRESENT VALUE\\1&0&0\\2&0&0\\3&0.75&0.506228637151512\\4&0.87&0.515109841312065\\5&1.0092&8.73578093453209\\Intrinsic&Value&9.75711941299567\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-%26DIVIDENDS%26PRESENT%20VALUE%5C%5C1%260%260%5C%5C2%260%260%5C%5C3%260.75%260.506228637151512%5C%5C4%260.87%260.515109841312065%5C%5C5%261.0092%268.73578093453209%5C%5CIntrinsic%26Value%269.75711941299567%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
We multiply year 3 by 1.16 to get year 4
Then we multiply year 4 by 1.16 to get year 5 dividends.
Then we use the dividend growth model to get the value ofthe future years

Again, this value is set 5 years into the future, so we have to calculate the present value

Same process is done for year 3 and 4


Then we add the three values to get the value of the stock today.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The Price and the Quality
For selection of vendor for the Nori, the prioritized factors are Quality and Price.
Quality is the essential factor for the product and without adequate quality, the product cannot survived in the market. hence quality of the product is of higher priority.
Price is the key element for vendor selection, as it is the base on which the decision of the suplier is being made. Price decides the business viability and it develops the platform for the business. So price is of higher priority factor for the vendor selection for the Nori product.
The answer in the space provided is the interactive advertising.
It is a media based marketing that is responsible for promoting their business
or the products that they manufacture or services that they offer in means of
providing information or announcing it to their consumers.
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, the missing question read;
Version 1: George walks away. He never talks to Elaine or Jerry again.
Version 2: George confronts Elaine, saying “I am angry about what you have been saying. I do not want you spreading rumors about me. If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
Version 3: George yells at Elaine to shut u.p and then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired.
Version 4: George demands that Elaine tell him where she heard that. Elaine tells him not to worry about it and tries to crack a joke about how much the boss is late.
Answer:
- <u>Version 1: non-confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 2: cooperative</u>
- <u>Version 3: confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 4: confrontational and cooperative</u>
Explanation:
1. In this scenario it is evident that George avoids confrontation with Elaine. In fact, we are told that "[He] walks away..."
2. In this scenario, however, we notice a cooperative deposition between George and Elaine. He made this lear when he said, "...If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
3. Confrontation occurs in this scenario as we are told that "George... then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired. "
4. By demanding "that Elaine tells him where she heard that" indicates confrontation. While Elaine's cracking a joke about how much the boss is late shows cooperation.
Answer: OPTION A
Explanation: For winning the suit of negligence- duty, breach, cause and damage are the four elements that the plaintiff needs to prove. Intent is not an element of negligence.
Intent, used as a short form for intention, can be defined as the commitment of an individual to do certain action in present or in future period.