1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lisa [10]
3 years ago
14

At 55 mph, under good condi

Law
2 answers:
Hoochie [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

400

Explanation:

At 55 mph, in good conditions, your vehicle will travel about ____ feet in the time that it takes you to react to an object in your path and bring your vehicle to a complete stop.

Tom [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Goyens performed good service for Texas during the Revolution from Mexico.

Explanation:

Goyens performed good service for Texas during the Revolution from Mexico. With Adolphus Sterne and Sam Houston, he helped negotiate a treaty with the Cherokee to keep them pacified in East Texas while the Texans fought for their independence to the south and west.

You might be interested in
How is primary elections differ from national elections?
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

primary elections is an election which is primarily

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

<u>Limited governments</u> have legal restrictions imposed on their powers. Examples of these governments include the United Kingdom and <u>Germany.</u> The citizens of these countries enjoy <u>basic</u> rights such as freedom of speech and the press. However, <u>unconfined governments</u> don’t face any legal restrictions on their powers. As a result, the citizens of these governments often experience human rights violations.

6 0
3 years ago
The attempt to develop a means for determining the values of a society is known as
vichka [17]
Ethics 2, he attempt to develop a means for determining the values of society is known as ethics. 2. An action or law that conflicts with the most fundamental law of the nation and is, therefore, no longer valid, is said to be unconstitutional
8 0
3 years ago
Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni
alisha [4.7K]

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
The critical concept that emerged in the palko decision is that of ________ rights.
Lelu [443]

Answer:

Double Jeopardy right

Explanation:

This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Fourteenth Amendment limited States rights and reaffirmed the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land. (2 points)
    10·1 answer
  • What is the correct hand signal to indicate a right turn?
    8·1 answer
  • Chapter 2 Review crossword
    9·2 answers
  • Why do people do debate...?<br><br> and pls give me example of a debate
    9·1 answer
  • What type of fertilization occurs when the female releases eggs into the water or attaches them to a plant or rock and the male
    15·2 answers
  • Explain the importance of the law. please like 10 points. please help.​
    15·2 answers
  • In Engel v. Vitale, why did the courts rule that prayer in schools was unconstitutional?
    6·2 answers
  • Winston pays a yearly fee to Barbara to rent stall space for his horse at the fairgrounds. Winston’s tenancy is best classified
    8·1 answer
  • Public figures: Group of answer choices can never have an action in defamation. lose their defamation action rights if the remar
    5·1 answer
  • Because teens can obtain tobacco illegally, ____ are being removed from unsupervised areas.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!