1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_lady [41]
3 years ago
10

Courts of general jurisdiction typically have

History
2 answers:
storchak [24]3 years ago
6 0

Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury.

<h3>Further explanation </h3>

A court of general jurisdiction is a court with authority to hear cases of all kinds for example the criminal, civil, family, probate, etc.

Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury. A judge is a public officer who presides over a lower court of law. A judge may be appointed by the executive branch of government through the Attorney General. Judge analyze and interpret all evidence in a court of law regarding cases to dictate a fair verdict and a sentence when necessary. Judge act as impartial mediators in courts of law, taking part in hearings, civil litigation cases, etc.

Many cases begin in this court. Usually, the cases are like felonies, serious misdemeanors, fraud, bankruptcy, and other "white collar crimes". In this  courts of general jurisdiction, cases are heard through trial by the jury.

One significant effect of the classification of a court is the liability that a judge from that court might face for stepping beyond the bounds of that court.

Whereas a jury is a group of ordinary individuals who are chosen by a court to hear the evidence presented by the defendant and the plaintiff and a jury gives a verdict on a case

<h3>Learn more</h3>
  1. Learn more about general jurisdiction brainly.com/question/6995997

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Grade:  9

Subject:  history

Chapter:  general jurisdiction

Keywords:  general jurisdiction

My name is Ann [436]3 years ago
3 0

Courts of general jurisdiction typically have \boxed{\text{a judge and jury}}.

Further Explanation:

In the United States, every state is authorized to authenticate its judiciary, to apprehend predicaments associated with state law. Commonly, Courts overhear both public and felonious petitions, but they are assembled into specialized departments where some departments manage civil cases, another department handles criminal cases, to instruct people accordingly.

Commonly, state courts are public law courts and implement their corresponding state regulations and systems to resolve cases. They are classified accordingly and employ the authority following their state's law, state ordinances, and compulsory judgments of governments in their state court authority. Where appropriate, they also utilize federal law. Ordinarily, a particular judicial officer, customarily described as the arbitrator, utilizes primary domain by presiding over conflicted criminal or civil lawsuits which culminate in actions, although most subjects end short of approaching to trials. Cases in state judiciaries commence in a hearing court where prosecutions and illegal proceedings are recorded and data is finally performed if a case progresses to a conference or trial. Seizures in these fields are usually held only after comprehensive pre-trial systems that in more than 90% of circumstances point to a default decision in a civil case, an accepted judgment concluding the case or plea agreement choosing a criminal trial or pre-trial analysis of the case by a judge both on the excellence or on procedural areas. The area outside of any republic in the United States, such as the District of Columbia, usually has a court system authorized under federal or provincial law which interchanges for a State court system and is distinguished from the common federal court system.

Learn more:

1. The supreme court is best characterized as? brainly.com/question/4840499

2. Supreme court justices are appointed for a term of ? brainly.com/question/543316

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: NA

Keywords:

Court , jury , regulations , state , authority , judiciary , tribunal , federal , district , law , officer , actions, subject , trials Seizures , United States , conference , departments.

You might be interested in
Identify one aspect of life that changed in Mesopotamia over time
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

Explanation:Not only was Mesopotamia one of the first places to develop agriculture, it was also at the crossroads of the Egyptian and the Indus Valley civilizations. This made it a melting pot of languages and cultures that stimulated a lasting impact on writing, technology, language, trade, religion, and law.

6 0
3 years ago
How do religions spread?
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

Explanation:

La generación contemporánea ha visto los avances más extraordinarios del nivel de vida en la historia universal, pero también el triunfo de una sociedad signada por la despersonalización y el consumismo, la devastación del medio ambiente y la posibilidad de autodestrucción de la especie humana. La angustia, la anomia, la soledad y diversos fenómenos de alienación son el reverso de una era caracterizada por el progreso material. En su ética de la conservación y la prevención, Hans Jonas, el gran filósofo de la religión, aseveró que la amenaza de un catástrofe general proviene del exceso de éxito que le ha sido deparado al proyecto de Francis Bacon, que es el designio moderno por excelencia: el dominio sobre la naturaleza para el mejoramiento del destino humano. (El marxismo resultaría ser uno de los más fieles, pero no el mejor ejecutor del ideal de Bacon.) La destrucción ecológica es el fenómeno más visible que nos muestra, de acuerdo a Jonas, los peligros inherentes al programa de conocer es poder, que se basa en una actitud arrogante y al mismo tiempo demasiado optimista en torno a un crecimiento económico y un progreso científico incesantes e irrestrictos1.

Es menester, por consiguiente, una reflexión que nos enseñe otra vez lo problemático del progreso histórico y de toda actividad científico-técnica; una reflexión como la emprendieron Max Horkheimer y Theodor W. Adorno al criticar el optimismo del racionalismo y la Ilustración. Este optimismo parecía totalmente justificado, pues se basaba en los avances constantes y aparentemente imparables de la ciencia, la tecnología y la planificación, lo que hacía a primera vista superfluo todo análisis de la destructividad del progreso2. La genuina religiosidad nunca se dejó impresionar por los logros materiales de la era moderna. En cambio marxistas, liberales, positivistas y hasta anarquistas han creído de buena fe que los adelantos de la ciencia y la tecnología significarían a la larga considerables avances sociales, políticos y culturales, los cuales, a su vez, consolidarían el rumbo del progreso material y harían desaparecer factores anacrónicos e innecesarios como la religión y el nacionalismo3. El pensamiento religioso nos puede ayudar a comprender los límites de nuestro mundo y las limitaciones de nuestra mente, pues nos muestra los peligros derivados de la soberbia humana (la hybris clásica) en el intento de domeñar totalmente la naturaleza y la sociedad y, por consiguiente, nos sugiere la pertinencia de un sentido práctico de modestia frente a los logros más reputados de la civilización moderna4.

No hay que retornar dogmáticamente a filosofías pretéritas, pero sí considerar de nuevo la posición clásica: según Aristóteles la admiración y el asombro fueron los motivos primigenios de la filosofía: la admiración y el asombro entendidos como el anhelo de aprender y la filosofía comprendida como el respeto liminar al universo y la explicación de lo que parece incomprensible para escapar de la ignorancia5. El avance de este tipo de conocimiento, calificado como metafísico, místico o especulativo, ha sido uno de los factores principales para el avance del saber, y no solamente la utilidad o el interés material. El asombro ante el cosmos y frente a las patologías de la sociedad contribuye a generar el espíritu crítico. Según Aristóteles, las ciencias teórico-contemplativas, como la filosofía y la teología, tienen una dignidad superior, más elevada que las disciplinas prácticas y utilitarias, ya que las primeras tienen que ver con una razón global, es decir con una racionalidad que supera su carácter instrumental y que por ello tal vez participa de lo divino6. Por otra parte, todo conocimiento digno de este nombre presupone una duda; el objetivo (telos) de una indagación sólo puede ser vislumbrado por aquél que ha dudado anteriormente7. Y las dudas se originan, por ejemplo, cuando existen opiniones divergentes sobre el mismo asunto, como es el caso paradigmático del carácter, el valor y la significación actual de la religión. Y simultáneamente el auténtico pensamiento religioso ha vislumbrado algunos de los aspectos dilemáticos centrales de nuestra época en realidad, de todos los tiempos8.

e es propio del mito y del arte y la vinculación de ambos con lo sagrado10.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you mean by wood's despatch ?
Roman55 [17]
Wood's Despatch is the event observed in History of India under British Rule. Sir Charles Wood was the Preseident of Board of Control of the British East India Company. In 1854 he sent the Despatch to the then Governor Lord Dalhousie regarding the education in India. ... This is known as Wood's despatch
6 0
3 years ago
What leadership positions were created in Virginia?
Anna35 [415]
Beaing thA  POTUS duh
7 0
3 years ago
How did Taft’s “dollar diplomacy” differ from Roosevelt’s “big stick” policy? Was one approach more or less successful than the
Elanso [62]

The Big Stick Diplomacy was implemented by Theodore Roosevelt and was a policy of intervenience in Latin American affairs because in the American view those countries could not keep their affairs in order.

The Dollar Diplomacy adopted by President Taft that promoted the American business interests abroad by replacing military alliances with economic ties, increasing American influences and securing lasting peace.

Both Diplomacies had problems but historians say that Roosevelt’s Big Stick was more successful overall because it resulted in more benefits than failures. The other two diplomacies increased hostility in Latin America and in Asia that eventually influenced the Alliances in WWI.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did hernando de Soto impact the American Indian groups he encountered
    8·1 answer
  • BIG POINTS Help
    10·1 answer
  • How did the capture of Vicksburg contribute to the Union victory in the Civil War?
    11·2 answers
  • 2. What was a result of the Judiciary Act of 1789? A. establishment of the office of the Secretary of State B. creation of a sys
    15·2 answers
  • Alexander the great during his childhood was considered an unacceptable heir by the greeks because:
    8·1 answer
  • When looking at history we want to look at different perspectives for all of the following reasons except
    12·1 answer
  • One 19th-century civil war internal crisis in Qing China was the Taiping Uprising in Qing China. This was unlike any other Upris
    13·1 answer
  • In Langston Hughes's poem "The Negro Speaks of Rivers," what fact does he remind us of?
    12·2 answers
  • Because christians in the early Roman Empire were often persecuted for their beliefs, they often worshipped in private homes and
    8·2 answers
  • Which statements about the Twelve Tables are correct?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!