The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence.
<h3>What is illegally obtained evidence?</h3>
The term illegally Obtained Evidence is known to be the type of evidence that can be made or gotten that is against the normal way of obtaining evidence.
Note that The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence and this can influence the judgement made.
Learn more about evidence from
brainly.com/question/1256677
#SPJ4
Equality for all citizens!! The answer is c
The picture is not clear :(
Answer:
Well, the North wanted to abolish slavery however the South wanted to keep it, they are different because of their conflicting views.
Explanation:
D all of the above because anything in an ecosystem adds to the biodiversity of it.
