Answer:
a) 2.5%
b) 6%
c) 3.5%
Explanation:
The Formula to be used is the <em>habitat hypothesis </em>
as stated in the document attached below
a) it = 2%; it+1 =3%
= 0 + ( 2 + 3 ) / 2
= 2.5% ( two year nominal interest rate )
b) it = 2%; it+1+1 = 10%
= 0 + ( 2 + 10 ) / 2
= 6% ( two year nominal interest rate )
c) it = 2%; 1t+1 = 3%. ∝₂,t = 1%
= 1 + ( 2 + 3 ) / 2
= 1 + 2.5 = 3.5%
False it may be from the organization itself they might try rewarding the worker for example a company might take the workers to expensive workshops or to a trip as a type of reward or giving them a bonus to their salaries or a health insurance or a simple thing like involving them in a decision this may motivate the worker and make them feel part of the company <span />
The answer & explanation for this question is given in the attachment below.
Answer:
c) is the same along both curves.
Explanation:
Two straight-line PPFs have the same vertical intercept, but curve I is flatter than curve II. The opportunity cost of producing the good on the horizontal axis is the same along both curves.
Answer:
d. the quantity demanded for the market will increase to less than 30,000 workers.
Explanation:
Missing options:
- a. the quantity demanded for the market will increase to 30,000 workers.
-
b. the quantity demanded for the market will increase to more than 30,000 workers.
-
c. the quantity demanded for the market will increase, but we can't tell which of the above answers is correct.
-
d. the quantity demanded for the market will increase to less than 30,000 workers.
maximum total demand for labor = 30 (at $8) x 1,000 firms = 30,000 workers, but since the equilibrium rate had been $9 for many years, some workers have already been hired at $9, and it is usually very difficult to lower someone's wage once they have been working. Even thought the quantity demanded will increase, it will probably not be able to reach 30,000 workers.
