Answer:
Mother/Writer:
1. Disturbed over her son's new development at the age of thirteen.
2. Endeavored to punish her son when he misbehaves.
Son/Teenager:
1. Stubborn and disobedient to the mother
2. Lazy and dirty
3. Ready to withstand his mother
Explanation:
The above are my observations of the mother and son.
We see that the mother was not happy with who her son became. She experienced tough time in the hands of her thirteen years old son. The son, on the hand was disobedient and defiant. He was also lazy and unkempt. He was a son that was almost ready to withstand his mother. Whenever the mother punishes him for his misbehaviors, he feels like revenging the mother.
Answer: Dr. Naismith would have been surprised, if he had known how popular basketball would become.
Explanation:
The best way to combine these two sentences is to put a comma between them.
When joined together, these two sentences form a third conditional sentence.
In a third conditional sentence, one part of the sentence contains 'would have' + past participle <em>(would have been surprised)</em>, while the other part of the sentence contains 'if' and past perfect form of the verb (<em>if he had known</em>). Third conditional sentences are used to talk about impossible outcomes. Dr. Naismith was a physical educator who died in 1939. Therefore, the scenario of him witnessing the popularity of basketball is not possible.
No, Lay testimony is the evidence brought in light by the witness who is not an expert but can testify to interferences and opinions.
Lay opinion testimony is admissible as long as it helps as a factfinder and rationally depends on the personal perceptions. Lay witness’ opinions are often more helpful than the other raw data which form the base of the belief.
Lay opinion testimony refers to evidence given by a witness who is not qualified as an expert but who testifies to opinions or inferences. For example, a testimony showing a person was “angry” or “ excited” is more convincing and understandable compared to a lengthy, physical description of the man’s outward expression.
The law as stated in the book(decree/act) is known the following:
USCS Fed Rules Evid R 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses.
Additionally, it is limited to opinions which are rational, helpful and not based on specific knowledge under Rule 702.
It would depend, as for if you would just call her Mother, and no one described her actually name or called hers something else. The word Mother would be capitalized. I think that it i used correctly, im not sure 100% correct though.
The theme for the fox and the crane is "do not play tricks on your neighbor unless you can stand the same treatment yourself" this answer relates to the story because the fox treated the crane badly but he expected her to give him a proper dinner. for the second story, the theme is "do not listen to the advice of someone who wants to lower you to their own level" this relates to the story because the fox is trying to get all the foxes to cut their tails off so he would not be the only one who is made fun of. the moral of the last story is "there is always someone who is worse off than yourself/others" this relates to the story because the hares are scared of everything that comes in their path...they are one of the creatures that fear almost everything