Answer:
The conception of man as an economic animal is implied by the view that economic production is the determining “factor” or “sphere” of man or society. Against this conception can be put another, that of man as praxis. This takes account of man as a creative being, capable of realizing his freedom through his own activity. In this article the theory of the determining role of the “economic factor”, and the theory of factors in general have been examined. The economic interpretation of history, a variant of the theory of factors, has been acknowledged as partly true for the self‐alienated man and society, but the theory of factors in any variant has been found inadequate as a general theory of man, or society. The possibility of freedom cannot be reduced to the fact that the determining roles played by “factors”, vary, or to the hope that the economic “factor” can be subordinated to a “better” one. Man's freedom consists in his resolving the conflict of “factors”, and in realizing himself as an integral creative being, no longer split into independent and mutually opposed spheres.
Explanation:
that should help
Answer:
Newton Corporation
Net income for the year = $120
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Direct materials cost = $400
Direct labor cost = 800
Manufacturing overhead 400
Total manufacturing cost $1,600
Cost per unit = $8
Ending Inventory of finished goods = 150 units * $8 = $1,200
Cost of goods sold = 50 * $8 = $400
Sales revenue = 50 * $12 = $600
Newton Corporation
Income Statement
For the year ended December 31:
Sales Revenue $600
Cost of goods sold 400
Gross income $200
Selling & Admin.
expense 80
Net Income $120
b) Newton Corporation's net income is the difference between the Sales Revenue, cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses.
Answer: Finance Course Prompts Debate,” argues that “the $600,000 is a low cost if the [financial literacy program] is effective. An
effective course will return that investment,” speaking in reference to the cost of the program. Courses, especially financial
literacy, greatly give back on investments made in them by using the students’ education gained from the class.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. a matrix structure.
Explanation:
A matrix organizational structure is a type work structure where reporting relationships between employees are set up as a matrix rather than the conventional hierarchy approach. This simply means, there are two (2) chains of command; employees have dual reporting relationships to both a project and functional manager.
The matrix organizational structure can be classified into three (3) categories, these are;
1. Weak matrix structure.
2. Balanced matrix structure.
3. Strong matrix structure.
In project management, a strong matrix is also known as the project matrix and it basically refers to a matrix project that is significantly similar or having close resemblance with the pure project. In the strong matrix structure, the project manager controls most of the project activities and functions, including the assignment and control of project resources.
This ultimately implies that the project manager primarily holds a full-time role and has a sole authority, and as such control the budget. The role of the functional manager is usually minimal.
Hence, a project organization structure where team members report to a functional manager as well as to the project manager is called a matrix structure.
