1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solmaris [256]
2 years ago
8

Which of the following best summarizes the status of ww2 technologies today

History
1 answer:
LUCKY_DIMON [66]2 years ago
5 0

what are the options

You might be interested in
Is charley Crocker the most notoriously corrupt robber baron<br><br> True <br> False
djyliett [7]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Nope he wasnt.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
according to the information presented here, what can you include about automobile accidents in your city
Tom [10]

Answer:

A.) most accidents occur at intersections

Explanation:

just because...

4 0
3 years ago
1. How do Muslims abroad view the United States?
vodka [1.7K]
2. Muslims are not terrorists because Islam is a peaceful religion that does not condemn violence. Though there are a few terrorists that identify themselves as Muslim they are not following the religious book of Islam “the koran”. There are about 1.9 billion Muslims in the world and the majority are not terrorists. 4. Muslims religion is Islam. 5. Women are not valued equally with men in Islam society in most Muslim country’s such as Afghanistan women are not allowed in school they are told to cook and clean they wear scarfs because it is traditional form it’s worn as privacy to stop men to not to stare at women
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two political parties emerged after the election of 1824? the Republican Party and the Whig Party the Democratic Party and
ruslelena [56]
It would be the "Democratic Party and the Republican Party" that <span>emerged after the election of 1824, since it was during this time that the United States began to become far more polarized over issues pertaining to government power. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1963 the united states stopped its support for the leader of south vietnam because
    14·2 answers
  • On June 28th 1914 the archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria was assassinated by?
    11·2 answers
  • President Theodore Roosevelt's "speak softly and carry a big stick” foreign policy was based on
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the fallowing led to the increased popularity of automobiles
    8·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete the sentences. An author's describes the author's perspective or relationship to the materia
    12·2 answers
  • What was unique about the Ottoman Janissary soldiers?
    13·1 answer
  • The 1776 document, which officially declared the United States an independent nation is?
    6·1 answer
  • Which country did the Soviet Union have the non aggression pact with?
    8·1 answer
  • A) Choose ONE of the events listed below to represent the emergence of an American identity. Explain your choice, and provide at
    6·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Toleration Act of 1649?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!