Hello. You did not present the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. In the meantime I will help you in the best possible way.
A textual evidence is a sentence that proves an affirmation presented in the text. This sentence justifies and shows that the statement presented is real and true.
It is only possible to point out the textual evidence of the physical and mental effects that Lyddie is facing, through reading the text, but we can consider that a hard work of a long journey would promote a great physical and mental fatigue in Lyddie, making her feel overloaded and even promoting symptoms such as pain, stress, discouragement and fatigue. In that case, you should find, in your text, evidence of these symptoms and the occurrence of these, or similar symptoms, in Lyddie.
My claim is that wearing seatbelts should be a law. Wearing seatbelts can not only keep you safe, but safe another person’s life. For example, if you were to be driving down the road, and someone were to hit the break, you’d go flying. The car could let out the airbag and possibly suffocate someone in the car. Also careful driving should need a seat belt, not only does it ensure safety, but it keeps to in place so that you don’t slip, and hurt the others around.
In conclusion, seatbelts should have a place in the law because not only could it save your life, it could save a lot more.
No because an ellipsis purpose is to add suspension or drag the sentence of for the reader to question its purpose. This sentence uses the ellipsis with the purpose of a comma, adding a pause before explaining the subject further.
I would say 4, it seems a lot clearer than the other answers to me.
The answer that best fits the blank provided is the term PARADOS. Literally, the term "parados" means entrance. In the given scenario above, it is classified as parados for it serves as the start before the rising action happens. The answer for this would be A.
