This is a hard one and I can see why you decided to post it here. B is most definitely wrong but the other three are all neck and neck. There are both even pros and cons of A and C but I think it would be more reasonable to adopt a general routine. So I think the answer would be C.
The correct option is C: Slippery slope. This type of fallacy suggests that a certain or certain events will take place with no real or sufficient evidence to prove so. This is the case, especially with events that seem unlikely to happen given the circumstances. In this example, the reasoning goes like this: if Quentin fails to pass his math test, as a consequence, he will lose the opportunity of going to college and he will have to live in his parent’s basement for the rest of his life. However, the fact that he does not pass this test is not enough evidence that those two situations will actually take place. For example, Quentin may take the test again and try passing it, or if he eventually cannot enter college, he can look for a job that is profitable and that will allow him to become independent and move from his parent’s house, etc.
I've read this book before!
Both of there lives before where poor and unhealthy but mutual
However after the pearl they lost koyotito after the pearl gave them bad luck where they're house in their village was burned so after that they were still poor but had bad luck which ruined their family , even killed a family member
Based on this excerpt, the author's purpose for writing is to heal. In literature, the term purpose refers to a person's reason for writing, such as to inform, entertain, explain, or persuade. The author's goal is to convince the reader to agree with the author. This means the author wants the reader to think or act in a specific way, such as this case, the author's purpose is to persuade the reader that to heal is the is the purpose for writing.
