Answer:
The evidence supports / disproves Queenie's claim because... . Our conclusion / recommendations (the final CLAIM and what should happen next)
Explanation:
Segsulizing women's clothing is not at all true statement as there is nothing related to men and women clothing with the segsulizing as clothing is not the factor of showing up.
<h3>What is meant by segsulizing women's clothing?</h3>
Segsulizing women's clothing is referred here about the women who use their reveling clothes to impress the men or women with their clothes.
The clothes of any person is not to impress anybody, but it is what a person feels comfortable in wears it. The clothes cannot be the factor to judge any person.
Thus, Segsulizing women's clothing is not at all true statement
For more details about segsulizing women's clothing, click here:
brainly.com/question/21092069
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. Missing conclusion, Our client has an enforceable contract
Explanation:
The argument in this scenario, is a modus ponens and is missing its conclusion. Which in this case would be "Our client has an enforceable contract". It is a modus ponens because it has two pieces of logic that are connected and when one is true so is the other. In this scenario, the contract is in writing which is one piece of logic and is true, therefore, the other piece of logic should be true too.
