Answer:
Vaughn should produce Plain as it makes greater profit.
Explanation:
Vaughn Manufacturing can sell all the units it can produce of either Plain or Fancy but not both.
Plain has a unit contribution margin of $86 and takes two machine hours to make and Fancy has a unit contribution margin of $111 and takes three machine hours to make.
There are 2400 machine hours available to manufacture a product.
Profit per machine hour for Plain
= 
= $43
Profit per machine hour for Fancy
= 
= $37
The difference in profit
= $43 - $37
= $6
Plain makes $6 more profit per machine hour than Fancy.
A = $9.99, the amount needed after 1 year
r = 0.018% = 0.00018, interest rate
n = 12, compoundings per year
t = 1, one year duration
Let P = required balance at the beginning of the year.
Then
P(1 + 0.00018/12)¹² = 9.99
1.00018P = 9.99
P = $9.988 ≈ $9.99
Answer: $9.99
Answer:
B. $497,000
Explanation:
Consolidated Balance of Equipment
Excess value at the acquisition $110,000
($350,000-$240000)
Book value as on Dec 31 2018 of Ford $170,000
Book value as on Dec 31 2018 of Regent $250,000
Less: excess depreciation <u>-$33,000 </u> ($110,000/10*3)
Consolidated balance of equipment <u>$497,000</u>
Answer:
green marketing
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about the Sanchez Foods Inc. which is a large food manufacturing corporation that earns more profits than its competitors. The company uses only organically grown grains and fruits. It also promotes organic farming and helps nonprofit agencies that focus on food and nutrition causes. The company recently decided to use a third-party recycling logo. In this scenario, Sanchez Foods is most likely to have adopted the practice of green marketing.
Green marketing can be regarded as practice of developing as well as advertising products which is been
based on their real as well as their perceived environmental sustainability.
In a case, whereby green marketing activities of a Company are not substantiated from significant investments and doesn't substantiated by operational changes, the company
may be criticized as been using false or misleading advertising.
