1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
d1i1m1o1n [39]
3 years ago
9

Shawn and Harry signed a contract for Shawn to build a house for Harry according to the specifications provided by Harry. The co

ntract stated that Shawn would be paid $125,000. Shawn unintentionally deviated from the specifications in several minor respects. The house was soundly constructed, and Shawn completed the work within the promised time. Harry refused to pay Shawn any of the $125,000, arguing that the house did not conform to the specifications. In this case,
A) Harry will get a decree of specific performance.
B) Shawn has no right to be paid for any of his work because he breached the contract.
C) if the court finds that Shawn has substantially performed, he will be able to recover the contract price less any damages caused by his failure to perform as promised.
D) if the court finds that Shawn has substantially performed, he will be able to recover the contract price less any damages caused to him because of the delay in payment.
Business
1 answer:
Nostrana [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C) if the court finds that Shawn has substantially performed, he will be able to recover the contract price less any damages caused by his failure to perform as promised.

Explanation:

From the question Harry signed a contract with Shawn to build a house. Harry made some specification to build the house. But Shawn did not follow the specifications now Harry doesn't want to pay him the contract amount.

Under doctrine of specific performance, Harry can pay less money than the contract price. Because Shawn has performed substantially, he is not entitled to receive the contract price as agreed.

You might be interested in
Ryan Lock had planned his trip to the Olympic Games in Rio de​ Janeiro, Brazil, for many months. He had ​budgeted-saved-$15 comm
WITCHER [35]

Answer:

He should have exchanged the dollars for real in January 2016 to maximize his Brazilian spending​. The exchange rate in January will result to highest Real (BRL) of R$<em>59,463.00</em>

Explanation:

To arrive at R$ equivalent of $15,000 on monthly basis, since  BRL=1.00 USD, multiply R$ exchange rate each month by $15,000.

For January,  3.9642*15,000= R$59,463.00

     February  3.8402*15,000= $57,603.00, etc.

Solution  

S/N Month      BRL=1.00 USD          BRL Equivalent(R$)

1 January              3.9642              59,463.00

2 February            3.8402               57,603.00

3 March                 3.6086               54,129.00

4 April                    3.6851                55,276.50

5 May                     3.5843               53,764.50

6 June                    3.5493               53,239.50

7 July                      3.2331               48,496.50

8 Aug-08                3.2312               48,468.00

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose the market for this product is served by two firms who have formed a cartel and are colluding to set the price and quant
kondaur [170]

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

because there are less things in the number and if this dos not help you I am sorry I am not good at math

3 0
3 years ago
On March 14, Teal Co. accepted a 120-day, 6% note in the amount of $10,000 from AZC Co., a customer. On the due date of the note
Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:a credit to  Interest revenue for $200

Explanation:

Interest =  Principal x rate x time ( period )

= $10,000 x 6% x 120/360

=$200

    Account titles and explanation               Debit Credit  

                       Cash                                $10,200  

    Note receivable                                          $10,000  

    Interest revenue                                           $200

Therefore, The journal entry that Teal would make to record payment of this note would include a credit to  Interest revenue for $200

5 0
3 years ago
Two investment advisers are comparing performance. One averaged a 19% return and the other a 16% return. However, the beta for t
finlep [7]

Answer: Adviser B is the superior stock selector.

Explanation:

For the comparision between the two investment advisers, the Jenson's Alpha will be utilized.

Jenson's Alpha:

= Portfolio Actual Return - CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio Return)

T Bill Rate(Risk free rate) = 6%

Market return(E(Em) = 14%

Beta of Investment Adviser A = 1.5

Beta of Investment Adviser B = 1

For Adviser A:

CAPM = Risk free return + Beta ( E(Rm) - Risk free return)

CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio) = 6 + 1.5 (14-6)

= 6 + 12

= 18%

Actual Return = 19%

Jenson's Alpha = 19% - 18% = 1%

For Adviser B:

CAPM = Risk free return + Beta ( E(Rm) - Risk free return)

CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio) = 6 + 1(14-6) = 6 + 1(8) = 14%

Actual Return = 16%

Jenson's Alpha = 16% - 14% = 2%

Adviser B is a better selector because he has a larger alpha of 2% compared to Adviser A who has 1%.

T Bill Rate(Risk free rate) = 3%

Market return(E(Rm) = 15%

Beta of Investment Adviser A = 1.5

Beta of Investment Adviser B = 1

For Adviser A:

CAPM = Risk free return + Beta ( E(Rm) - Risk free return)

CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio) = 3 + 1.5 (15-3)

= 3 + 18

= 21%

Actual Return = 19%

Jenson's Alpha = 19% - 21% = -2%

For Adviser B:

CAPM = Risk free return + Beta ( E(Rm) - Risk free return)

CAPM(Benchmark Portfolio) = 3 + 1(15-3) = 3 + 1(12) = 15%

Actual Return = 16%

Jenson's Alpha = 16% - 15% = 1%

Given the changes, Adviser B is still the better selector because he has a larger alpha of 1% compared to Adviser A who has -2%.

7 0
3 years ago
An investor bought a one-acre lot on the outskirts of a city for $12,700 cash. Each year she paid $175 of property taxes. At the
german

Answer:

79.5%.

Explanation:

Rate of return = \frac{final value - initial value}{initial value} x 100

The cost of the acre = $12700.

Total property taxes paid for 7 years = $175 x 7

                                                             = $1225

Net value of cost = $12700 + $1225

                             = $13925

Net value of the land when sold = $25000

∴ Rate of return = \frac{25000 - 13925}{13925} x 100

                          = 0.7953 x 100

                          = 79.53%

The rate of return of the acre of land is 79.5%.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is a distinguishing characteristic of oligopoly? Question 1 options:_____
    9·1 answer
  • Managers are increasingly viewing the world as "one big marketplace" due to globalization and the interconnectedness of national
    7·1 answer
  • Match the job role with the job title. (More than three answers)
    9·1 answer
  • explain how mtumi can apply concentric, horizontal and conglomerate diversification. give examples to support your answer
    10·1 answer
  • The first costs assigned to ending inventory are the costs of the beginning inventory under the
    13·1 answer
  • The most affective communicaters speak at the rate of ...... words per minute?
    8·1 answer
  • Marko, Inc., is considering the purchase of ABC Co. Marko believes that ABC Co. can generate cash flows of $6300, $11,300, and $
    15·1 answer
  • On February IN , Marshak's investment account has a balance Of $19,800. He deposited ,200 on April I and $2,600 on May l . He wi
    10·1 answer
  • When cash is received from a stockholder in exchange for common stock, the transaction is recorded by debiting Cash and creditin
    15·1 answer
  • The management at an auto manufacturer planned to terminate production due to labor issues that were consuming most of the profi
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!