The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The United States presidents use these methods of communication in the following ways. I am going to include an example to persuade the public in the answer.
Method 1: Rallies.
One of the best methods of communication because the president appears in person, right there, in front of his followers, addressing them or thanking them for their support. It is a great chance to greet them and have direct interaction with them.
Method 2: Social Media.
The president can have immediate communication with the citizens or his followers through social media. No intermediaries. The president interacting with them at the right precise moment.
Method 3: Press conferences.
An excellent way to address the national media to answer questions on important issues or promote his executive agenda.
Method 4: Televised interviews.
A more direct and personal way to establish a conversation with major TV news programs.
Method 5: The State of the Union address
The official way to address Congress and the nation to inform about the situation in the United States.
Answer:
D.) A need for factory workers in large cities to help produce machinery and supplies
Explanation:
Nandyan na nga nag hanap pa ng iba
Mabait at nandyan palagi ang kasintahan ni Maria, naghanap pa rin siya ng bago
The term Phillip Converse coined about how many people, when asked the same question at different times, will often change their answer, often randomly, is known as "Non-Attitudes."
Phillip Converse was known for being a Political Science Professor at the University of Michigan.
In one of his research which he documented in a book titled "The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Public."
He concluded that normal people who are not political elites don't ideologically take policies but rather flow with the prevailing issues.
Therefore he described these people as "non-attitude" because they don't have the attitude of a typical politician.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Phillip Converse defined "non-attitudes" as many people, when asked the same question at different times, will often change their answer, often randomly.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/1470181
As Europeans expanded their market reach into the colonial sphere, they devised a new economic policy to ensure the colonies’ profitability. The philosophy of mercantilism shaped European perceptions of wealth from the 1500s to the late 1700s. Mercantilism held that only a limited amount of wealth, as measured in gold and silver bullion, existed in the world. In order to gain power, nations had to amass wealth by mining these precious raw materials from their colonial possessions. Mercantilists did not believe in free trade, arguing instead that the nation should control trade to create wealth and to enhance state power. In this view, colonies existed to strengthen the colonizing nation.
Colonial mercantilism, a set of protectionist policies designed to benefit the colonizing nation, relied on several factors:
Colonies rich in raw materials
Cheap labor
Colonial loyalty to the home government
Control of the shipping trade
Under this system, the colonies sent their raw materials—harvested by enslaved people or native workers—to Europe. European industry then produced and sent finished materials—like textiles, tools, manufactured goods, and clothing—back to the colonies. Colonists were forbidden from trading with other countries.
Commodification quickly affected production in the New World. American silver, tobacco, and other items—which were used by native peoples for ritual purposes—became European commodities with monetary value. Before the arrival of the Spanish, for example, the Inca people of the Andes consumed chicha, a corn beer, for ritual purposes only. When the Spanish discovered chicha, they bought and traded for it, detracting from its spiritual significance for market gain. This process disrupted native economies and spurred early commercial capitalism.
