Answer:
Natural resources
Explanation:
Im not quite sure what your asking but if im right I think they have the competitive advantage of natural resource which would be the cow poop/manure that theyre using to power there facilities and fuel milk tankers.
sorry if im wrong
A number of separate but interdependent budgets that formally lay out the company's sales, production, and financial goals and that culminates in a cash budget, budgeted income statement, and budgeted balance sheet is master budget.
The lower-level budgets, cash flow projections, budgeted financial statements, and financial plans of an organisation are all included in the master budget, which is a thorough financial planning document. It is often created by a company's budget committee under the direction of the budget director.
To know more about Master Budget here
brainly.com/question/28217954
#SPJ4
Answer:
if YTM at 4% price : $2,902.1237
if YTM at 8% price : $1,788.0448
The bonds are above face value asthey offer a higher coupon payment than the market yield therefore the bond holders are willing to pay above theri face value
Explanation:
the market price of the bond will be the present value of coupo payment and maturity:
C 150.000
time 30
rate 0.04
PV $2,593.8050
Maturity 1,000.00
time 30.00
rate 0.04
PV 308.32
PV c $2,593.8050
PV m $308.3187
Total $2,902.1237
No we repeat the process with the yield at 8%
C 150.000
time 30
rate 0.08
PV $1,688.6675
Maturity 1,000.00
time 30.00
rate 0.08
PV 99.38
PV c $1,688.6675
PV m $99.3773
Total $1,788.0448
Hello There!
Your answer would be <u>C). A tortious act may also be a criminal act.</u>
The reason why C would be your answer is because a tortious act is something that harms someone in any way. The reason why it "may" be a criminal act is because determine if the tortious act is a criminal act really depends on the scenario that is occurring. For example, someone could cause a tortious act in a way of self defense, this scenario would be debatable because the person that committed the tortious act had a valid reason in doing so, and that was protecting themselves. But, if a person was to cause a tortious act by hurting someone to steal from them, then that would definitely be a criminal act because they are performing dangerous things to someone else, and the person could file a lawsuit against it.
Let's dive into why the other answer choices are incorrect. We can use the old fashion process of elimination:
Answer choice "A). A tortious act is always a criminal act" is incorrect because it is not always a criminal act, it depends on the scenario it's in. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "B). A criminal act is always a tortious act" is incorrect because there are MANY criminal acts that doesn't harm anyone, for example, tax evasion (not paying taxes) is a criminal act, but does not cause any harm to anyone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "D). A tortious act is the same as a contract dispute" is incorrect because harming someone is not the same as not doing what a contract says. A contact dispute is when someone that's part of a contract did not do a duty that the contract says that they're suppose to do, and that usually doesn't have to be any harm to anyone. That would not be the same as a tortious act, harming someone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer: The evaluation of investments is important for knowing the real picture of the financial status of the organization.
Explanation:
The organization may have an internal bias that presenting the data for evaluating the investment. Being a member of the finance department I will suggest the organization get the financial statements and other finance-related documents so as to detect the internal bias in the investment statement.
