Answer: creeping featurism
Explanation: Creeping featurism is a slang used for the term feature creep. It refers to the problem faced by the consumers due to continuous addition of features in an existing product. These addition make the product more complex and hard to use for the users.
In the given case, some customers of mobile phone have a belief that the new features added to the phones have made it complex and less reliable.
Thus, we can conclude that the given case is an example of creeping featurism.
Answer:
Dr Interest expense $33,500
Cr Discount on bonds payable $1,100
Cr Cash $32,400
Explanation:
Discount on bonds payable=$540,000-$529,000=$11,000
Amortization of discount=discount on bonds issue/period of the bond
period to maturity of the bond is 5 years *2 =10 since the bond pays interest semi-annually
Amortization =$11,000/10=$1,100
Semi-annual interest=$540,000*12%/2=$32,400
the bond semi-annual interest expense=discount amortization+interest payment
the bond semi-annual interest expense=$32,400+$1,100=$33,500
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
It is 16.9
Explanation:
Operating cycle = Inventory turnover + Receivable turn over - payable turnover
Hence, Operating cycle = 7.3+9.6
=16.9
Operating cycle implies how long it takes us to convert entire production process to cash .
It has an direct relationship with the level of working capital required. The higher the operating cycle, the higher the working capital investment required to keep the operation running.
A cash driven businesses like restaurant which hardly sell on credit will certainly have shorter operating cycle compared to a manufacturing company.
