Answer:
$75,240
Explanation:
Given that,
Consumer price index in 1999 = 170
Salary in 1999 = $44,000
Consumer price index in 2016 = 290
Therefore, the required salary is calculated as follows:
= Salary in 1999 × (Consumer price index in 2016 ÷ Consumer price index in 1999)
= $44,000 × (290 ÷ 170)
= $44,000 × 1.71
= $75,240
Hence, the amount of salary have to earn in 2016 in order to equal your 1999 real income is $75,240.
Answer:
Seybert purchased the Wang investment for $173,000
Explanation:
Since there is a credit balance. It means the stock is increased in value by $27,000. So that the stock was purchased at $173,000 ($200,000-$27,000).
Answer:
$20,400
Explanation:
The computation of the bad debt expense for 2020 is shown below:
Ending balance of Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts = Beginning balance of Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts + bad debts -write off amount
where,
Ending balance of allowance for uncollected accounts is
= $800,000 × 5%
= $40,000
Beginning balance of Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts is $40,000
And, the written off amount is
= $28,800 - $8,400
= $20,400
So, the bad debt expense is
= $40,000 - $40,000 + $20,400
= $20,400
We simply applied the above formula so that the bad debt could arrive
Answer:
Imitation.
Explanation:
Organizations following an imitation strategy try to both minimize risk and maximize opportunity for profit, moving into new products or new markets only after innovators have proven their viability. Imitation strategy is one the most effective way of saving your time, energy and money. It is known as the low-cost strategy as well particularly when the option of choosing and selecting is too difficult or costly. This strategy has been widely and successfully used by many well-renowned brands, for example, Coca Cola, once has imitated RC Cola when they replicated their diet cola options, McDonald's has taken the idea of fast food chin from the White Castle.
Answer:
In general, the <u>higher</u> the risk of a firm as perceived by its existing and potential investors, the greater is the firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC).
- If a firm is considered to be risky, they will get debt at a high rate to compensate for the risk making WACC greater.
The calculation of a firm’s weighted average cost of capital should be based on the <u>after-tax</u> cost of the dollar of financial capital raised.
- Interest is tax deductible so WACC is calculated net of taxes to cater for this.
It is generally believed that the proportions, or weights, used in the calculation of a firm’s weighted average cost of capital should be based on the market values of the firm’s capital sources. This is because the market value weighting system is more consistent with maximizing the value of the firm’s <u>Shareholder wealth.</u>
- Market Values are the true reflection of shareholder wealth and this is what the company should aim to maximise.
Although the use of market value weights is theoretically superior to the use of book value weights in the calculation of a firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC), firms often use book value weights due to their relative stability compared to the daily changes in market values. <u>True</u>
- Market values tend to fluctuate quite often so it is easier for companies to use book value amounts.
A firm’s new investments, existing assets, and capital structure affect its overall degree of risk and, in turn, its weighted average cost of capital. <u>True</u>
- The assets and potential assets that a company has as well as how it funded those assets determine just how risky the company is and as earlier mentioned, the riskier the firm, the higher the WACC so risk does have an effect on WACC.
