Why did the Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States (1944) anger supporters of civil liberties?
Answer: Out of all the options presented above the one that represents the reason why it made supporters of civil liberties angry is answer choice B) It made the internment of certain American citizens legitimate. As we already know the wartime policy toward Japanese Americans was confinement in internment camps.
I hope it helps, Regards.
The Great Compromise solved the problem of representation because it included both equal representation and proportional representation. The large states got the House which was proportional representation and the small states got the Senate which was equal representation.
For example, other countries that wanted higher control of various regions started investing in other aspects of warfare such as aircraft building which was not covered in the conference. Japan for example started annexing territory in order to ensure greater control over the Pacific region which was also not forbidden by the conference.
Hm i have a few, what about you?
