1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mrac [35]
3 years ago
15

What was the outcome of Oswald's trial for the assassination of President Kennedy? A. He was killed before a trial could begin.

History
2 answers:
Shkiper50 [21]3 years ago
3 0
<span>He was killed before a trial could begin. </span>
serious [3.7K]3 years ago
3 0
A. He was killed before a trial could begin. <span>
</span>
You might be interested in
How were the british able to conquer india?
melisa1 [442]
There are a good number of reasons why the British were able to do so, and in fact rule over India effectively for over a century.

Disunity among Indian princely states. India was more a collection of warring princely states, at loggerheads with each other. The British sucessfully used this to play off one state against another. Add to it there was no dearth of people willing to betray the kingdom for a few pieces of silver. Robert Clive succeeded at Plassey, because Mir Jaffar was willing to betray his master Siraj-Ud-Daulah in lie of being the Nawab. Mir Jaffar himself was betrayed by Mir Qasim later on.Tipu Sultan one of the most redoubtable fighters against the British rule, was finally defeated, as the Marathas, King of Mysore, Nizam of Hyderabad all joined hands with the British.
Superiority over other colonial powers. The other colonial powers in India competing for the share of resources were France,Portugal,Denmark, Holland. Of the 4, Denmark and Holland could never really be serious competitors to the British, they had their own trading posts, scattered around, but were never a serious threat. Portugal focussed primarily on the Western coast, Goa, parts of Kerala, Karnataka, and this left the British with vast swathes of unoccupied territory. That left France as the major contender to Britian in the race for colonialism. The British Army was more well equipped, more professional, more disciplined compared to the French army, suffering from indiscipline and corruption. This made the British win key battles all over the East Coast, as they effectively grabbed control.
Doctrine of Lapse. One of the most effective tactics, the British used to take over most of India. Instead of waging an all out war against some of the princely states, they signed a treaty with them, where in if the ruling king died without a heir, the East India company could take over that. And that is how Satara became one of the first states to end up under British rule. And that was also the main reason for the conflict in Jhansi.
Subsidiary alliance was also an effective instrument. According to this alliance, the kingdom which signs the treaty will have to maintain the following rules:

The British agreed to maintain a permanent and fixed subsidiary force within the territory of their ally.
In return, they didn't take money but took over a part of the territory of the ally.
A British officer called "resident" was placed at the court of the ruler.{he could interfere in the internal matters of the kingdom}
The ally could not maintain any relation with any other ruler without the approval of the British.{so,when the rulers wanted to revolt against the British they are alone.}
The Indian rulers felt a false sense of security but in reality they were losing their independence. On the other hand the Britishers maintained large forces at the expenses of the Indian rulers and also increase their area of influence. Some states brought under control through this policy are Hyderabad, Tanjore, Awadh, etc.
At the end of it all, the British had the advantage of better manpower, were militarily more powerful and stronger, and add to it they had some very canny strategists too. And the disunity among Indian princely states, their constant warring with each other, just added to the advantage.
3 0
3 years ago
Which president was also a general in the union army during the civil war
olya-2409 [2.1K]
Ulysses S. GrantGeneral Ulysses S. Grant led the Union Army during the later years of the civil war, and later became the President of The United States. 
6 0
3 years ago
Marginal physical product (MPP) is:
xeze [42]

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀A

8 0
2 years ago
After World War II, which of the following did West German socialist chancellors include in their expansion of the welfare state
snow_tiger [21]
I would say the answer would be health care, insurance, and financial aid.


I hope this helps!!!!!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP I’ll give brainliest!!!
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

I'd say it's the last one because Germany had to pay a lot of reparations to the allies to repair. I hope this helps :)

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was the British general that miss judged the patriots play station on Butler Hill and lost many of his troops
    7·2 answers
  • Read the quotation.
    11·2 answers
  • What year juluis ceasar became emperor
    8·2 answers
  • Which is a set of push and pull factors tied to immigration that are most directly related?
    10·2 answers
  • What kingdom developed along yellow river
    7·2 answers
  • Tennage sexual activity may have
    11·2 answers
  • Where was the birthplace of American textile manufacturing?
    11·1 answer
  • Increasing the minimum wage could result in increased revenues for the federal government for which of the
    13·2 answers
  • What was the aim of the suffragist movement?
    5·2 answers
  • What happened to England right after imperialism​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!