how are the two arguments made in the passages different hey the first passage claims that pets in class will help children with
health problems II positive pets will make some health problems worse be the first passage claims that students nervousness will decrease around pets II says the students nervousness will increase around pets
There are two main ideas for each passage, in the first one it mentions the positive outcomes of having a pet in class; it can help children with health problems and nervousness in students will decrease. In this sentences it supports the idea of a pet in class, saying the positive results of it and how it helps or it will help children.
In the second passage it mentions the negative outcomes of having a pet in class; they will make some health problems worst and the nervousness in students will increase around them. These two ideas are against the possibility of having a pet in class, mentioning how it will affect students instead of helping them.
What makes these two passages different is the opinion towards one main idea: pets in class. One passage supports it and one is against it.
The thesis is a discussion about the general picture of the world's political situation in the lights of human rights. It doesn't only concern Germany. It is not about the concentration camps, as well. The latter is an example to cast light today's situation. Since, Sasha has to give examples, these examples are related to ethnic and political differences. The correct answer is C.
A. Pedants have the right of way at intersections. A pedant is a person who is a perfectionist and just obnoxiously meticulous, specifically with language or academics. The proper word to use for selection A. would be pedestrian, which means a person walking along a road.
