The correct statement is D. APICAL MERISTEMS ARE SOMETIMES CHANGED INTO FLORAL MERISTEMS.
Apical Meristems are found in the tips of the roots and in the buds of the shoots. They supply cells for the plants to grow in length.
Apical Meristems are found in herbaceous plants, woody plants, grasses, and flowering plants.
In flowering plants, shoot apical meristem develops into an inflorescence meristem which produces the floral meristem. The floral meristem is responsible for the production of the sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels of the flower.
Okay, to start off, the basic difference between prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells is prokaryotic cells are cells without a nucleus, and eukaryotic cells are cells that contain a nucleus.
So based off that information alone, you can answer #1. Cell A does not have a nucleus (big circle shape), while Cell B does. Therefore, Cell A is the prokaryotic cell.
As for #2, prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells DO have similarities despite their differences. For instance, they both have some of the same organelles, like the plasma membrane, ribosomes, cytoplasm, and DNA.
Finally for #3, two differences are that #1, prokaryotic cells have nucleoids while eukaryotic cells have a nucleus, and #2, prokaryotes have circular DNA while eukaryotes have linear DNA.
Your best bet is finding a visual aid in a textbook or online to help you, so you can better identify organelles and eukaryotic/prokaryotic cells. Also, there are some cheesy videos out there on YouTube which I was forced to sit through in Bio class last year such as the Amoeba Sister's youtube channel which could help. Hope this helped!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruBAHiij4EA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IlzKri08kk
Answer and Explanation:
Observing population directly gives you accurate result .
Direct observation does not need any intermediary as they themselves go for survey.
So, it is cost efficient.
Whereas indirect observing may involve manipulations.
It requires someone or many to hire who helps in surveying.
It incurs cost.
Thus, direct observation is always better than indirect observation.
"SCIENTIFIC" is the answer to this question,
hugs :))
