Answer:
It is not always necessary to lie.
Explanation:
Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.
From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.
The answer is innovation. As indicated by Merton, there are five sorts of aberrance in view of these criteria: congruity, development, formality, retreatism, and resistance. Auxiliary functionalism contends that freak conduct plays a dynamic, useful part in the public eye by at last sticking distinctive populaces inside a general public.
This question is missing the options. I've found them online. They are as follows:
Mr. Reed would be considered a/an _________ offender because he does have the funds necessary to hire an attorney on his own.
a. a problem
b. an indigent
c. a contract
d. an assigned
e. an at risk
Answer:
Mr. Reed would be considered a/an b. indigent offender because he does have the funds necessary to hire an attorney on his own.
Explanation:
An indigent can be defined as someone who does not have the means and resources to provide the basic necessities of life, such as food and clothing. Likewise, an indigent offender is someone who does not have sufficient income to afford an attorney. In such cases, the court appoints and pays for the lawyer to represent the offender. This is actually a quite common occurrence, sometimes reaching the number of 82% of court appointed lawyers for felony defendants.
