1. Simple optical microscope. One lens.
Disadvantage: Only Van Leeuwenhoek made them, and he's dead.
Advantage: Worked pretty well. With them, Van Leeuwenhoek discovered protozoa and bacteria.
2. Compound optical microscope. Has both an ocular and objective lens.
Disadvantage: limited resolution. Can resolve bacteria, but not smaller things like viruses.
Advantage: can be used with live specimens (using phase contrast or polarized or other special illumination).
3. Binocular dissecting microscope (optic). Has a pair of ocular and objective lenses, and supposedly presents a "3D" view of the specimen to the viewer (I was never able to see in 3D using these darn things).
Disadvantage: Limited magnification
Advantage: Can be used to perform surgery on small but not microscopic specimens, such as fruit flies. Is used in "microsurgery" in hospitals too.
Hope this helps buddy!
If a bush is a living plant, then yes it's alive, then explain how plants are alive to finish the "Why or why not?".
Answer:
The study that involves the research over earth atmosphere and climate changes in the past is known as the paleoclimatology. The study mainly concentrate over the past climates of Earth and atmospheric changes that took place in the past centuries. Studying fossils.
Explanation:
The first one is the right answer
True. Since electron microscopes use electrons instead of light, it can magnify up to 500,000 times of it’s actual size.
