Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The case about which the question is referring to is Griswold v. Connecticut.
The Griswold v. Connecticut was the case in which Estelle Griswold, an Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut and Dr C. Lee Buxton opened a clinic to counsel the married couples educating and counselling them about preventing contraception.
In Connecticut, the use of contraception or giving counselling about the same was a punishable offence with a fine of $50. Griswold and Buxton had challenged this law of Connecticut and were arrested with a fine. After there case being upheld in Appellate Division Court and Connecticut Supreme Court, Griswold appealed her case in the Supreme Court of the United States in 1965. In the same year, the Supreme Court gave a verdict in favour of Griswold based on the 14th Amendment of the Due Process which gives a right to privacy.
So, the answer is true.
Come up with a logical plan, that will work, to improve the country’s water pollution problem.
It changes the way we eat, sleep, work, and also it changes how we communicate. In the newer generation people now use technology for ordering food instead of making it, sleeping on beds that can now change temperature and softness, working isn't necessary anymore because people use website on the Internet to get work done instead of going in the offices, and back then people used hawk mailers but but now we have laptops, cellphones, ect. We have become lazy to society and the exonomy.
Answer:
the law that defines the crime is a substantive law, and the law that provides for the right to appeal is a procedural law.
Explanation:
