<span>That's an interesting question. Feudal Japan had a more formalized and ritualized kind of culture than feudal Europe did; elaborate rules of courtesy applied at all levels of society, whereas European peasants were pretty crude for the most part. In both societies there was a unifying religious principle, which in Europe was Christianity and the authority of the Church, and in Japan was shintoism and the authority of the Emperor. In both cases, a social hierarchy attempted, with considerable success, to control everyone's lives; everyone owed their fealty to someone, except for the kings in Europe or the Emperor in Japan, who didn't owe loyalty to anyone, since there was no higher authority (at least, not counting deities). Both societies had similar types of weaponry (European armor was considerably tougher) and skilled swordsmen were much to be feared and respected. In the lower classes, life was cheap. Neither society had any concept of human rights; only the nobility had rights.</span>
Answer:
The French Revolution (1789 – 1799), had a deep and lasting impact upon the whole several English observers drew comparisons with the American Revolution which ... and that its sudden and sweeping changes could only result in catastrophe.
Explanation:
Answer:
might be b or c or a i dont know
Explanation:
The Free-Soil Party’s goal was to keep slavery out of the territories was the issue why were Whigs and Democrats forced to take a stand on slavery in the 1848 election .
Explanation:
The Free-Soil Party needed to support slavery in the new territories.
After the war, of course, there was no slavery to further, but the Dixiecrats were solidly upon equal rights for former slaves. It wasn't until John Kennedy and the 1960s that the Democrats began advocating ethnic assimilation and justice.
