New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
<h3>How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?</h3>
New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.
India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.
Find out more on the Austrialia colony at brainly.com/question/4196080.
#SPJ1
Judaism was the primary faith<span> to </span>believe in one<span> god. Up </span>to it purpose<span>, </span>different<span> cultures, </span>like<span> the Egyptians, believed in </span>many<span> gods that </span>ruled totally different<span> aspects of their life. They were </span>additionally distinctive<span> in </span>a basic cognitive process<span> that their god set down specific </span>ethical<span> rules that </span>they ought to<span> live by, </span>tho'<span> the Egyptians did believe that if you </span>did not<span> live </span>an ethical<span> life </span>normally<span>, </span>you'd<span> not be </span>able to<span> participate </span>within the <span>life.</span>
Most of early history, these was no seperation of church and state, so they were one and the same.
This applies to both the English civil war ( if you can call any war civil) and the Dutch revolt. Both were to end Catholic domination of the Protasant subjects.
All wars are both religious and political. But end up anti-religious as they violate the very tenets of any religion they expound so it is only being about power.
Protasants revolted against the Catholics for freedom but then in-fighting over which Protasant religion is good.
The politics of any war are power and greed. Someone wants what someone else has and demands the right to take it and deny others taking it from them.
Many claim they are trying to protect the ' true' religion or claim for religious freedom and then show they are no better then the heritics they decry and deny others the same freedoms they want,
When all is said and done - all is just for power.
War has never settled any differences. It just pospones the reversal of power as will always happen. The French Revolution almost did by beheading the royals but as many escaped and Napolian brought new ones in. Nothing much changed.
The American revolution - which was the 1st non-religious war started the change for wars to not just be about religion.
In the early 20th century and late 1900s; A complicated piece of legislation, it essentially gave preference to immigrants from Central, Northern and Western Europe, severely limiting the numbers from Russia and Southern Europe, and declared all potential immigrants from Asia unworthy of entry into the United States.
I hope this helped ://
"WE THE PEOPLE" Popular sovereignty or the authority of the people referenced in the Preamble of the Constitution - This principle states that government power comes from the consent of the governed (the citizens). One is example of popular sovereignty is the election of representatives and senators in which the citizens hold the vote to elect the legislatures the citizens favor.
