1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vazorg [7]
3 years ago
11

How did the actions of Union generals Grant and Sherman affect the outcome of the Civil War?

History
2 answers:
Kamila [148]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is A) They destroyed the South’s morale and captured its capital, forcing the South to surrender.

The actions of Union generals Grant and Sherman affected the outcome of the Civil War in that they destroyed the South’s morale and captured its capital, forcing the South to surrender.

Confederate General Joseph E. Johnston surrendered to Union's General William E: Sherman at Bennet Place on April 26, 1865. General Robert E. Lee had surrendered at the Appotomax to General Ulysses S. Grant, and with these Union's victories, the war was over. So yes, the actions of Union generals Grant and Sherman affected the outcome of the Civil War in that they destroyed the South’s morale and captured its capital, forcing the South to surrender.

The other options of the question were B) They respected Southerners’ property, helping the war to end peacefully. C) They rebuilt Southern cities that had been destroyed after the South surrendered. D)They lost so many soldiers that they had to stop fighting, forcing the Union to surrender.

densk [106]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A) They destroyed the South’s morale and captured its capital, forcing the South to surrender.

Explanation: Edu 2020

You might be interested in
Han emperors were so successful at maintaining power because:
attashe74 [19]
Because the Silk Road established steady trade
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was involved (besides Christopher Columbus) in the first voyage.
Pie

Answer:

Explanation:

MY MOM! Jk. Amerigo Vespucci.

6 0
3 years ago
Defend or refute the following statement 1763 was an important watershed year
puteri [66]

Answer:  The correct answer is :  It was a very important year because the British government began to carry out several acts that led to the rage of the colonists, who felt threatened in their freedom, new regulations, new measures in parliament promoted by George Grenville that alerted To the settlers.

3 0
3 years ago
Manifest destiny was realized in the 1800s
Nuetrik [128]

Answer:

i am confused

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Alexander Hamilton's economic measures were prompted by his determination to strengthen the national government.
marin [14]
Alexander Hamilton's economic measures were prompted by his determination to strengthen the national government. True or false. True, Alexander Hamilton's economic measures were prompted by his determination to strengthen the national government.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Would this be Social or Economic:
    14·1 answer
  • How did the Haiti Revolution affect American Expansion?
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the 4th presedent of usa
    10·2 answers
  • NEED HELPPPPPP PLZZZZ AWARD 95 POINTS!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Who were the muckrakers? explain the effect the muckrakers had on american life
    11·2 answers
  • Name one of the tricks to looking words up in a dictionary and explain why it is helpful
    11·2 answers
  • What was one advantage the Confederacy had over the Union in the Civil War? Select the best answer from the choices provided. co
    15·1 answer
  • Who trying f me drop the addy
    14·1 answer
  • Number three can someone plz help i will give brainliest!!!!!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • What ruler united the local tribes and formed the Empire of Mali?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!