1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
34kurt
3 years ago
15

Judicial review of credentialing decisions is when the courts recognize that the procedure of credentialing hearing may be infor

mal, and a hospital is will not be required to follow all of the procedural requirements of a civil or criminal trial. True False
Law
1 answer:
Sati [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Medical credentialing is the one procedure that allows patients to confidently place their trust in their chosen healthcare providers.

The patient in full trust on the service provider to keep his health records confidential without disclosing it to anyone without his due knowledge.

Patients are made aware of their health care experience and professional merits as this is the case with medical credentialing.

The court fully knows it is informal in credentialing hearing and in accessing such sensitive information the patient must be aware and unless it is the only means of Justice.

You might be interested in
This refers to the process of a person admitting to guilt in a criminal or civil case, often in the hopes of receiving a lesser
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

guilty plea

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can anyone please help?
olganol [36]
I think that it is not he first option
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the relationships among community policing, problem-oriented policing, and intelligence-led policing? Are they similar
gladu [14]
They are similar because relationship amongst police can either affect some and harm others
3 0
3 years ago
The signals on a railroad crossing are defective. Although the railroad company was notified of the problem a month earlier, the
Dennis_Churaev [7]

I think it's both the railroad inspector and the driver who drives the car. The railroad inspector didn't come fix the problem and the driver didn't take his car to the shop to get his problem fixed. So honestly, it's both their faults.

5 0
3 years ago
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was u
natima [27]
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was unfairly prejudicial. ... If an appeals court finds that the evidence against Emerly should have been excluded, she can receive a new trial.





Hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • _____ signs tell you what roads, cities, and services are nearby.
    14·2 answers
  • You are being tailgated by another vehicle and stop and go traffic sometimes the tailgater honk their horn if you don’t accelera
    13·1 answer
  • What resources are needed to set up or establish perimeter?
    5·1 answer
  • This question is from Business Law
    7·1 answer
  • Who is all in the school build and who is virtual
    11·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASEEEE ILL MARK BRAINLIEST !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Who should decide if a book or movie is obscene? What definition should be used?
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the dark figure of crime and it's importance in understanding crime
    6·1 answer
  • Napisz list do kolegi (koleżanki) , w którym opiszesz mu (jej) jak wygląda nauka w Twojej szkole w czasie pandemii. Polski jak c
    12·1 answer
  • The u. S. Constitution resolved one weakness of the articles of confederation- group of answer choices
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!