1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dsp73
3 years ago
12

What was a positive impact of the developmen of canals in the U.S.?

History
1 answer:
nordsb [41]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: A positive impact that the development of canals in the U.S is B!

Explanation:

The canals allowed more ways to travel through some land to expand and secure more trades in the west !

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ASAP
a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

1 They had full control of Sicily and Corsica, this began the roman expansion past the Italian peninsula

2 It's was a agrarian based society, and its economic fortunes were largely dominated by agriculture to keep the citizens fed.

Explanation:

Past notes (just trust me)

4 0
3 years ago
An argument of John C. Calhoun in support of nullification was that the 1828 tariff:
Travka [436]

John Calhoun argued that the 1828 tariff helped the North at the expense of the South (c). This was the case because the tariff bolstered Northerner industrial markets but required Southerners to pay more for manufactured good.

8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP HISTORY WORK I GIVE BRAINLIEST TOO. It's just matching the letter to the number and it is from real history.
Karolina [17]

Answer:

16. y. Gibbons V Ogden

Explanation:

"This Supreme Court decision forbade states from enacting any legislation that would interfere with Congress's right to regulate commerce among the separate states." -From the National Archives

This decision was following the invention of the Steamboat by Robert Fulton

8 0
1 year ago
How did the gupta empire change Indian civilization?
Mila [183]

Under the Gupta dynasty, Indian civilization grew.

5 0
2 years ago
A key part of the war on crime that began in the 1960s was increased punishments for drug offenses. A key argument by many detra
krok68 [10]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

People who oppose the War on Drugs argue that drug offenders should not be incarcerated because most of them are not violent criminals, and being a drug addict should not be considered a crime but a disease, and correspondingly, should be treated by medical professionals.

Unfair incarceration of drug offenders contributes to the break up of families, specially in low-income areas, and this phenomenon as a whole affects society. Children born in households with incarcerated parents are more likely to be poor, to become addicts themselves, or to commit crimes in the future.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If Ptolemy were right about Venus, how would it appear to earthlings?
    12·1 answer
  • What was a major factor that led the United States to enter world warI?
    8·2 answers
  • Presidents Tyler and Jefferson both made executive decisions
    14·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast the organization, membership, leadership, and programs of the Knights of Labor and the American Federation
    10·1 answer
  • How did the religion of Islam change after the Hijrah?
    11·2 answers
  • The largest Nazi ghetto—the _________ ghetto—was located in __________ , and held around 400,000 prisoners within an area of 1.3
    13·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE!!
    15·1 answer
  • Which achievement of the Song Dynasty is supported by Source C ?
    14·1 answer
  • ______________________ is an organization in which people share costs and profits.
    14·1 answer
  • What was the name if the mass genocide that plagued the Jewish community? 1.Reconstruction
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!