The primary charge against Johnson was that he had violated the Tenure of Office Act, passed by Congress in March 1867 over Johnson's veto. Specifically, he had removed from office Edwin Stanton, the secretary of war, whom the act was largely designed to protect.
<h3>What happened to the Tenure of Office Act?</h3>
The Tenure of Office Act had been passed over Johnson's veto in 1867 and stated that a President could not dismiss appointed officials without the consent of Congress. Both Lincoln and Johnson had experienced problems with Stanton, an ally of the Radicals in Congress.
<h3>
What was the effect of the Tenure of Office Act?</h3>
The Tenure of Office Act had been passed over Johnson's veto in 1867 and stated that a President could not dismiss appointed officials without the consent of Congress.
Learn more about the Tenure of Office Act here: brainly.com/question/16379969
#SPJ2
Answer:
I feel like this is more of a question based on personal opinions but here is mine
Explanation:
I think that yes it was worth it because without that war many more Jews would have been killed and who knows what Hitler would have done next if he succeeded and killed all the Jews.
They did the negative deed in Beijing.
Essentially through dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Japanese soldiers had been fanatically loyal to the Emperor and fiercely defended the Pacific islands leading to heavy casualties amongst the American forces.
After the atom bomb was used Emperor Hirohito surrendered and Japanese soldiers followed his order to stop fighting.
Answer: Done
Explanation: Eisenhower's response to communism was different then Truman because unlike Truman Eisenhower believed that in order to make your point you have to be willing to go to the brink of war. This later became known as brinksmanship. Eisenhower decided to prepare for nuclear war instead of following Truman's approach of foreign policy.
