1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scrat [10]
3 years ago
6

1. How could a legislature restrain a monarch and establish limited government?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Montano1993 [528]3 years ago
4 0

1. How could a legislature restrain a monarch and establish limited government?

Answer: The monarch did not have all of the power. The parliament had the right to be make laws to govern the people.

Explanation:

A monarchy is a political system in which a king or queen has the power of the state. There are several types of monarchies; the absolute monarchy, the parliamentary monarchy, and the constitutional monarchy.

In the case of a parliamentary monarchy, parliament can establish laws to govern the people of the state, and some laws limit the power of the monarchy. An example of this type of monarchy in Great Britain.

2. How do direct democracy and representative democracy differ?

Answer: Direct democracy people govern themselves. Representative democracy the people elect representatives to govern them.

Explanation:

Direct democracy is one in which the people exercise their right to choose directly and without intermediaries. <em>An example of direct democracy is when activity was chosen in a classroom by voting by raising hands. </em>

Representative democracy is when people choose the people who will represent them in decision-making. <em>An example of representative democracy is when people vote for legislators, they will be in charge of legislating the country's laws on behalf of the people.</em>

3. Identifying What two ancient democracies helped shape the system of government we  have today?

Answer: The Greeks creating a democracy and the ancient Romans created the first republic.

Explanation:

The first form of registered democracy was in Greece. Specifically in the city-state of Athens. They exercised a direct democracy that was carried out through assemblies where all adult male citizens of Athens had the right to participate and vote on the decisions that would be made.

A republic is a form of government whose leader is elected by the citizens of the state. The first registered republic is the republic of Rome.

Both the Greek form of democracy as well as the Roman Republic are examples of political positions that have survived to this day.

4. Explaining How did the writings of John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu influence  ideas about government in what became the United States?

Answer: The ideas of John Locke and Baron de Monstesque are part of the Constitution of America, and the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

John Locke was an English empiricist philosopher, he believed in the natural rights inherent in all people; the right to life, liberty, and property. He also collaborated in the development of the social contract. Their ideas are reflected in the American Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Baron de Montesquieu was a Francis philosopher, inspired by the French revolution and made various contributions to the "Enlightenment" intellectual movement. Among its major contributions is the separation of the powered.

<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>

You might be interested in
Which best explains the president selects Justice of the Supreme Court
Molodets [167]
I think the president selects a judge whom he considers the most qualified and will most likely support his agenda. 
7 0
3 years ago
Identify three things the government controls in a communist country, and give one example of a current communist country.
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

1. Economy 2. Trade 3. Military

Example; China

Explanation:

In Communist Russia they have a Command Economy, they control Trade Routes, and they control the Military fully.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is it worth having many surveillance cameras to be able to provide more safety even if it meant your privacy would be affected?
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

Yes, it is worth having many surveillance cameras in order to provide more safety even if it meant my privacy will be affected.

Explanation:

The world is constantly changing and advancing, thus people around the world are becoming more skillful and technologically-advanced. This follows too that criminals are also becoming skillful in doing illegal activities. In order to prevent crimes from increasing, surveillance cameras should be set up in order to ward them off from doing the crime or to handle a speedy investigation of illegal activities.

Yes, privacy is also essential for me, but weighing the advantages of surveillance cameras is pivotal in ensuring that the society we're living is safe. "Privacy" would be nothing if I'd feel less safer living on Earth.

8 0
3 years ago
The United States is accusing China of dumping . The United States is imposing tariffs to raise the price of Chinese tires by of
valina [46]

Answer:

The United States is accusing China of dumping  

tires

. The United States is imposing tariffs to raise the price of Chinese tires by  

one-third

of the current cost. On the other hand, China is accusing the United States of  

protectionism

. To get back at the United States, China is investigating whether the United States unfairly  

subsidizes

its exports. Experts are afraid that this dispute between the two countries will erupt into a  

trade war

3 0
3 years ago
The following is true about divorce: Question 10 options: Divorce rates are higher for those having a long engagement. People wh
Licemer1 [7]

The correct answer is Divorce occurs more frequently at the lower socioeconomic levels.

Divorce is the action and effect of divorcing (dissolving a marriage legally, separating or separating people or things that were together).

Most western countries consider marriage to be a union between two people with legal, social and cultural recognition. Its objective is to offer a scope of mutual protection and of the offspring of the two people, who have rights and obligations for this union.  

Divorce, therefore, is the legal or religious dissolution of marriage by agreement between both parties or by the violation of any of the rights or obligations of marriage. Legislation usually protects children born during the dissolved bond as well as women.

When the law or religion does not allow divorce, the separation occurs, with no other remedy than the dissolution of the relationship and the removal of the couple.

Divorced people used to be socially condemned, as the belief in marriage for life was very strong. In recent decades, however, this concept has changed and now divorce is accepted as a natural situation for relationships that have not worked.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The spread of Christianity beyond the nations of Europe was due to two reasons:
    9·2 answers
  • ​most psychologists take an eclectic approach in terms of the perspectives of psychology they use to explain behavior and mental
    11·1 answer
  • Any time that a person defers payment, they are using A) debt. B) trade. C) credit. D) bartering. Eliminate
    10·2 answers
  • What are some limited and unlimited countries
    12·1 answer
  • What potential problem did the northwest ordinance create
    11·1 answer
  • Compare the beliefs of the Baha’i community with those of the three Abrahamic religions and point out what is unique to Baha’i.
    8·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the Bolsheviks?
    12·1 answer
  • Can u guys givme e answer​​​​​​
    10·2 answers
  • What does an Indo-Australian PLATE MODEL mook like?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!