A cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a(n): Sunk costs
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are
Sunk costs?</h3>
Generally, A cost that has already been incurred but cannot be recouped is referred to as a "sunk cost" in economics and the process of making business decisions. In contrast to sunk costs, prospective costs are future expenses that might be avoided if action is done, while sunk costs have already been incurred.
In conclusion, A cost that was incurred in the past but is not relevant to any choice that is being made at this time is considered to be a(n): Incurred expenses
Read more about Sunk costs
brainly.com/question/20438089
#SPJ1
Long-Grained rice. Hope this helps:)
Answer:
need recognition, information search, evaluation of alternatives, purchase, and post purchase behavior
Explanation:
In simple words, A consumer refers to an individual who acquire a resource in exchange of money or some other resource, to satisfy his or her needs.
The customer decision-making process involves consumers becoming aware of and identifying their interests, gathering input about how to better meet those needs, weighing alternative possible choices, making a buying judgment as well as evaluating their investment.
Answer: 10.13%
Explanation:
The after-tax return on the preferred shares would be:
= After-tax return + Premium required
= (8.8% * (1 - 25%)) + 1%
= 7.6%
For the preferred stock to be issued at par with the above after tax return:
= After tax return / ( 1 - tax)
= 7.6% ( 1 - 25%)
= 10.13%
Answer:
C. To enforce property rights
Explanation:
Government intervention in market can be non materistically via regulation , materistically via taxes & subsidy.
Although the second materislistic way of tax, subsidy comes under the perview of 'Government Budget' .
Government budget is anual financial statement showing economy's expected revenue & expenditure .
Economic growth & stability by reallocation of resources , reducing income inequalities - reflect 'efficiency' & 'equity' as valid reasons .
Foreign protection is also not invalid depending upon the initial budding stage of a developing economy & its global stand. Eg - India 1950 to 1990 .
However all these are progressive legitimate reason for govt. Intervention .
But , enforcing property rights is a feature of 'socialistic (communistic) economy - which has its own demerits like loss of consumers soveireignity , lack of postive competitive efficiency , govt overburden.
