In Europe, here are 22 paid vacation days and 13 paid when on holidays. Summing up, that could be a total of 4 weeks of vacation. While on the other hand, the United States as only 16 vacation days, both paid and unpaid, and that could be a total of around 2 weeks of vacation only.
Answer:
shifts the short-run Phillips curve up
Explanation:
The Phillips curve is a graph that shows the relationship between inflation and unemployment. In the short run, there is an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. The Phillip curve submits that high inflation is the cost to pay for economic growth. economic growth is accompanied by low unemployment. In the long run, there is no trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
An increase in expected inflation leads to an upward shift of the Phillips curve in the short run. Unemployment would stay unchanged. While a decrease in expected inflation leads to a downward shift of the Phillips curve
Stagflation in the 1970s have disproved the Phillips curve. Stagflation is when there is high unemployment and high inflation
Answer:Yes
Explanation:
Pooled data occur when there is a time series of different cross sections with each observations not necessarily from the same unit while Panel data is sample from the same units. The main difference between them is the "units". The units can be countries, households, schools or other things we are collating data on.
In pooled cross section, random samples from different time periods and from different units are taken e.g. we can take data on number of females and males in schools A, B and C in 2020 and schools X, Y and Z in 2023.
In pure panel data, we are using the same units e.g we can take data on genders in schools A, B and C in 2020 and collect data from the same schools in 2023. Therefore the main difference is just the units we observe.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the present values of both alternatives is shown below:
For alternative one, the lump sum amount is
= Yearly payment × PVIFA factor at 8% for 12 years
= $50,000 × 7.5361
= $376,805
And, in the alternative 2, the lumpsum amount i.e. present value is $452,000
So as we can see that the alternative 2 is better as the lumspsum amount is high as compared with the alternative 1
Answer:
Explanation:
this problem can be solved applying the concept of annuity, keep in mind that an annuity is a formula which allows you to calculate the future value of future payments affected by an interest rate.by definition the future value of an annuity is given by:
where 
is the future value of the annuity, 
is the interest rate for every period payment, n is the number of payments, and P is the regular amount paid
But there is an special thing to keep in mind and is the initial payment so we must to calculate the 4,000 in the future so we have:
