Tesla is the company is the best one people wish to invest for next 3 decades, based on its management, product or business model, financial condition, consistent past and potential earning.
<h3>What is the
management structure of Tesla?</h3>
According to management experts, Tesla is one company that has a practical organizational structure with a lot of hierarchical structure.
Tesla is a company that is reported to use functional centers that are well-structured and cover all aspect of their business operations, including finance, sales, marketing, and technology.
Thus, the company is Tesla.
For more information about management structure of Tesla, click here:
brainly.com/question/23554447
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Marketing is about to under understanding what generate values to the customer.
Answer:
d.the levels of activity for non-unit based cost drivers remain the same.
Explanation:
In the case of conventional and activity based costing calculations, the output should be similar to the activity levels that belong to the non-unit in which the cost driver should remain the same
Thus as per the given scenario, the option d is correct
And, the rest of the options seems incorrect
