Table/indexed.
Let's look at the three options and see what their advantages and disadvantages are:
Contiguous - In this scheme, the file is stored in contiguous blocks of the disk. It allows for easy random access of the data, but requires a contiguous sequence of blocks large enough to handle the entire file. Since the size of the file specified in this question varies quite a bit over it's lifespan, you're either going to be wasting a lot of space by having an allocation large enough to handle the maximum sized file, or the file will need to be copied whenever it grows and "bumps" into a file that was allocated after it. Because of this, this method is not the best.
Linked - The file is stored as a single, or double linked list of file blocks. This allows for the file to grow or shrink as needed, using only the amount of space needed for the file. Unfortunately, this storage scheme doesn't allow for random access of the file contents and the file can only be accessed sequentially. The question for this problem doesn't specify how the file is being accessed, so as long as random access isn't required, then this would be a reasonable allocation scheme. But I'm assuming that random access will be required, in which case, this scheme isn't ideal.
table/indexed - In this scheme, some disk blocks are used as tables to point to other disk blocks that actually contain the file data. It's almost as fast as contiguous allocation for random access of the file contents, yet allows for the growth and shrinkage of a file like linked allocation. As such, it handles all use cases at a relatively minor cost in total storage required. So this would be the most appropriate allocation scheme since the file access behavior wasn't specified in this question.
Answer:
less expansive
Explanation:
i took the test. i got it right
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Improperly packed by the party shipping them.
Explanation:
Carriers are liable for the loss of goods being transported by them under three scenarios: acts of God (<em>because they are unpredictable</em>), acts of the shipper (<em>negligence of the person providing with the goods being transported</em>), and acts of a public enemy (<em>a country engaging into the war</em>).
In that case, <em>the carrier is likely not to be found liable if the shipping items were incorrectly packaged the sending party</em>.
The amount that the company owe the bank in hard dollar fees, after adjustment for earnings credit is:$1081.
<h3>Amount owe after adjustment</h3>
Using this formula
Amount owe=Service charges-(Deposit balance×(1-Reserve requirement)×ECR× Number of days/Number of days in a year)
Let plug in the formula
Amount owe = 2500 - (4126000× (1-.10)×0.45%×31/365)
Amount owe = 2500 - (4126000×.90×0.45%×31/365)
Amount owe=2500-1,419
Amount owe =$1081
Therefore the amount that the company owe the bank in hard dollar fees, after adjustment for earnings credit is:$1081.
Learn more about Amount owe after adjustment here:brainly.com/question/27489236
#SPJ1
Answer:
B) $2,500 per month rent.
Explanation:
Incremental cash flows do not include interest payments on investment capital, since the cash flows should be equally generated if you invest your own money, another partner invests his money or someone else lends it to you. The same logic applies to the administrative costs of the credit line.
