The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
it might be A. Conspicuous or conherent ! but once again or twice research I think is good of the words and trying to see which sounds better in the blank or pretty much the sentence!
It can be inferred that Beowulf is sure he will win the context against Grendel because " he has the best sword ever made".
<h3>What is the evidence that Beowulf's sword helped him defeat Grendel?</h3>
In the narrative, Beowulf runs to the rear of the cave and discovers Grendel dead. He chops off his skull with the Giant sword.
The blood of those two creatures is so toxic and heated that the metal of the sword blade melts and drips away like an icicle, leaving just the hilt in Beowulf's palm.
Beowulf, the epic's protagonist, is a Geatish hero who battles the monster Grendel, Grendel's mother, and a fire-breathing dragon.
Beowulf's boasts and experiences show him to be the most powerful and capable warrior around. In his youth, he epitomizes all of the heroic culture's greatest virtues.
Learn more about Beowulf:
brainly.com/question/1830314
#SPJ1
