Answer:
Yes, there is a justification because the kotler could have hrut boyh him and shmuel
Explanation:
Answer: It is effective. It supports the claim clearly and logically
Explanation:
The choice that best describes the reason the author provides is that it is effective as it supports the claim clearly and logically.
This can be deuced from the passage as it was said that there will be a problem of illegal substances in sports unless there are stronger laws which can checkmate the people involved and thereby reducing to it to minimal.
Answer:
Malcolm X was a radical black power leader whose prominent role in the Nation of Islam was highly controversial. He justified the use of power to liberate blacks from their second-class status because of the historical failure of peaceful attempts previously.
He was raised in a neighborhood and a climate of violence; he saw less issue with taking it up in the name of a rightful cause. And this is definitely arguable, although personally I think he was in the right as well. MLK Jr had a bigger perspective, and Malcolm X could only remember the past and think back to its failures: think about Booker T's Atlanta Compromise in comparison with WEB DuBois.
A simile is an indirect comparison between two things using like or as, personification is the use of human characteristics to describe inanimate objects, paradox is a seeming contradiction, oxymoron is a combination of two words that seem to be contradictory and an anaphora is repetition of a word or phrase at the start of a series or clauses
Hi i can’t see the question can u copy and paste and reply to me