The teenage years.
Mainly because that's when puberty hits.
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer: Child-rearing methods
Explanation:
The child-rearing method is one of the type of parenting in which the it helps in developing the various types of emotional and also the children intellectual development.
The child rearing method is basically refers to the parenting technique that helps in determining the different types of relationship the parents have with their children.
According to the given question, Dr Rojo is basically conducting the various types of longitudinal study that helps in influence the child rearing method based on the given situation.
Therefore, Child-rearing methods is the correct answer.
Answer:
Categorical Logic defines & relates various kinds of logical statements. Traditional square of opposition is a particular relationship between 4 kinds of propositions : A, E, I, O.
Explanation:
Categorical Logic is scientific method of defining & connecting : various statements about - various category or classes of objects.
Traditional square of opposition shows relationship between various kinds of propositions, asserting or denying something about - all or few members of a group :
- A : Universal Affirmative ; eg - 'All S are P'
- E : Universal Negative ; eg - 'No S are P'
- I : Particular Affirmative ; eg - 'Some S is P'
- O : Particular Negative ; eg - 'Some S is not P'
Relationships between them :
- Contradictories : [A, O] & [E , I] : Opposite Truth Value - If one True , other is False & vice versa
- Contraries : [A , E] : Can't be true together, but can be false together
- Subcontraries : [I, O] : Can be true together , but cant be false together
- Sub alternates [A, I] & [E,O] : First 'A' or 'E' true implies second 'I' or 'O' true respectively. Second 'I' or 'O' false implies first 'A' or 'I' false respectively
