1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oduvanchick [21]
2 years ago
9

What's the difference between the American Revolution and the War for Independence? Explain.

Social Studies
1 answer:
sweet-ann [11.9K]2 years ago
7 0

Their isn't really a difference between the American Revolution and the War of Independence. The "War of independence" is another form of writing the "American Revolution."

The only difference I see that an independence was a part of a country that split from the dependent one while a revolution is in a war of independence, but doesn't always result in a independence. A revolution could occur in that one country alone without a war at all.

This war was fought between the 13 colonies and the UK.

  • First battle fought in Lexington and Concord.
  • Last battle fought in Yorktown.

After lots of fighting the 13 colonies pulled through and gained independence on July 4, 1776.

Hope This Helped! Good Luck!

You might be interested in
The Declaration of Independence states all people have certain unalienable rights. What do certain unalienable rights mean? *
Reil [10]

Certain unalienable rights mean certain right can never be taken away.

Option D

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

Unalienable rights are the rights that are given to a person as a birthright. These rights cannot be denied by any means nor can the individual give them up by choice.

In the drafts of The Declaration of Independence, many drafts mention passages about how the 'Creator' has given undeniable rights to all individuals. One such right as mentioned in the drafts is 'the liberty to life and enjoying it'. The passage further explains that these rights cannot be given up by us nor denied to us as they are a part of us. They help in defining the person that we become through the course of our life.

5 0
3 years ago
What was the Three-Fifths Compromise?
goblinko [34]

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

The 3/5 compromise was a compromise made by James Wilson. At this time, America was having trouble figuring out what slaves would count for towards population counts. They came up with this compromise to help settle this debate; which says every 5 slaves will count for 3 people.

3 0
2 years ago
Why was mendel's work not accepted at the time answers?
mina [271]

His work was ignored because it was not widely distributed, and he didn't make an effort to promote himself. Actually, the reasons are more complex. He was part of the social and scientific circle of the time. He had opportunities to travel and to attend scientific conferences . When he published his paper in 1865, it was exchanged with the publications of at least  120 other associations and societies and was available in many libraries and scientific institutes. His mathematical ratio of inheritance was probably not understood by many botanists . Subsequent mentions of Mendel's results usually focused on the hybrids that Mendel made , ignoring the mathematics altogether.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A leader is facilitating a group of diverse individuals — diverse in terms of nationality, race, ethnicity, and age. The leader
maksim [4K]

Answer:

Openly discuss his or her worldview and its impact on the group process, even at the risk of alienating some

Explanation:

When a person is assigned as the leader of a group they carry out their duties and expect the others to do so from the perspective of their own worldview. The leader cannot accommodate the worldview of every person in the group but can share his/her own worldview.

This would make the group members understand why the leader is thinking the way that he is. Although this may alienate some this is the best possible way to lead a team.

7 0
3 years ago
Trishna approaches conflict by removing herself from the situation. in other words, trishna illustrates what conflict management
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
The answer is Withdrawing management style
Withdrawing management style refers to a style of conflict resolution in which the person choose to pretending that there is nothing wrong in every conflicts.
This type of management style is the least suitable style for leadership and tend to cause negative disorders in personal life.
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to reciprocal determinism behavior is BEST described as the result of: personal factors. past behavior. environmental
    7·1 answer
  • Itumeleng Khune....human rights that you felt the media infringed upon each case​
    10·1 answer
  • The 2007 crash of the US housing market was an example of a(n) __________. A. social dilemma B. political conflict C. economic d
    13·2 answers
  • How does federalism guard against tyranny
    7·2 answers
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy attempts to produce change by
    11·1 answer
  • Which theory of language development proposes that children are born with a knowledge of general rules of syntax that determine
    11·1 answer
  • 3. Israel controls the West Bank and East Jerusalem.<br> True<br> False
    13·1 answer
  • Most often, an insurance deductible must be fulfilled
    14·2 answers
  • list 10 situations when it is appropriate to be obedient and 10 when it is appropriate to be disobedient​
    14·1 answer
  • The conceptual anchor of OB that suggests that an action may have different consequences in different situations is the _____ an
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!