All categories

3 years ago

Why is that market economies can often allocate resources in a more efficient and robust way than centrally planned economies?

Business

1 answer:

sammy [17]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Because market economies want to make money

You might be interested in

Is it possible for a country with a regressive tax system to have a tax-spending system that transfers resources from the rich t

lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:A

Explanation:

A regressive tax is a tax impose in such a manner that the tax rate decreases as the amount subject to taxation increases.

5 0

3 years ago

cash transactions involving the purchase and sale of long-term assets and current investments are classified on the statement of

ivanzaharov [21]

Answer: Investing Activities

Explanation: The investing activities lists all of the purchases and sales of long-term fixed assets, such as equipment, building, land, and the purchase of shares.

Hope this helps.

7 0

2 years ago

1. Consider an economy with a population of 100,000 households. 60 percent of households reportan annual income of $25,000 ("low

Leona [35]

Answer:

The total income earned by households in this economy is:

$4,700,000,000

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Household population = 100,000

Low earners = 60% with annual income of $25,000 each

Mid earners = 30% with annual income of $70,000 each

High earners = 10% with annual income of $110,000 each

60% of the population = 60,000 (100,000 * 60%) households

30% of the population = 30,000 (100,000 * 30%) households

10% of the population = 10,000 (100,000 * 10%) households

Total income earned by the households:

Low earners = 60,000 * $25,000 = $1,500,000,000

Mid earners = 30,000 * $70,000 = 2,100,000,000

High earners = 10,000 * $110,000 = 1,100,000,000

Total income earned in the economy $4,700,000,000

3 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is the advantage of cash-based accounting?

Alexxandr [17]

A) it is more accurate than accrual accounting.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two incinerators are being considered by a waste management company. Design A has an initial cost of $2,500,000, has annual oper

Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

Desing A: 23,024,370‬

Desing B: 22,520,274.6

It should purchase desing B as the capitalized cost is lower.

Explanation:

We consider annuity for the overhauls and then, perpetuity to consider this incinerators will last indefinitely.

maintenance cost: 800,000 / 0.05 = 16,000,000

Overhaul:

The company will need to fund 1,250,000 every 5 years. We need to determinate the annuity to obtain this future value:

$FV \div \frac{(1+r)^{time} -1}{rate} = C\\$

PV 1,250,000

time 5

rate 0.05

$1250000 \div \frac{(1+0.05)^{5} -1}{0.05} = C\\$

C $ $ 226,218.498

Then at perpetuity:

$ 226,218.498 / 0.05 = 4,524,370

Desing A capitalized cost:

2,500,000 + 16,000,000 + 4,524,370 = 23,024,370‬

We do the same for Desing B:

investment: 5,750,000

maintenance: 600,000 / 0.05 = 12,000,000

overhaul:

$3000000 \div \frac{1-(1+0.05)^{-10} }{0.05} = C\\$

C $ 238,513.725

238,513.73/0.05 = 4,770,274.6

Capitalized cost: 5,750,000 + 12,000,000 + 4,770,274.6 = 22,520,274.6‬

8 0

3 years ago