Answer:
C. Groupthink
Explanation:
Most of us can remember at least once when a group, when making a decision for the sake of beloved harmony, set aside individual ideas and opinions and followed a not very rational path. This kind of dysfunction in decision making, which in English is called groupthink. Groupthink occurs when an environment begins to show overestimation of group power and morality, with thoughts such as "Yes, we are good in every way!"; lack of openness to new ideas, always ignoring or rationalizing any questioning about the falseness of group assumptions and pressure for uniformity. These "symptoms" are similar to what is happening in the group exposed in the question, so we can conclude that the question is describing a situation where groupthink occurs.
Answer: It is called irresistible impulse standard.
Explanation:
In criminal law, irresistible impulse is a defense by excuse, in this case some sort of insanity, in which the individual states that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions that broke the law, because they were not able to control those actions, even if they knew them to be wrong.
The answer is "jumping to conclusions".
Jumping to conclusions is a mental term alluding to a correspondence snag where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having every one of the actualities; to achieve unjustifiable conclusions". As it were, "the point at which I neglect to recognize what I watched direct from what I have just gathered or assumed". Because it includes settling on choices without having enough data to make sure they are correct, this can offer ascent to terrible or impulsive choices.
Answer:
Both poems indicate that people must spend time alone.
Explanation:
Ocean warming provides a good example of a potential positive feedback mechanism.
