Answer: The research team can conclude right away that the cell line is a "cancer cell or a cell that emanates from a tumor cell".
Explanation: 'Density-dependent inhibition is when cell growth has a reached a limited density which in turn will slow down the rate of cell growth because of lack of new 'anchorage' point (new cells to adhere and be in contact with).
'Anchorage Dependence' is the need for cells to be in contact (adherence) with another layer of cells. Cells require anchorage in order to survive.
The reason why the researchers will conclude right away that the cell line is a "cancer/tumour cell" is because normal cells display density dependence inhibition while cancer cells 'proliferate' (increase in number) regardless/independent of cell density.
Normal cells adhere to each other (need to be in contact with each other) and form orderly array of cells while cancer cells do not adhere to cells and can migrate over adjacent cells thereby growing in a disorderly manner.
A <u>double-blind experiment </u>allows researchers to identify the specific effects of the independent variable from the possible effects of the experimenter's and the participants' expectations about it.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The double-blind experiment is conducted to ensure that the results of the experiments are not biased. The double-blind study states that the person who is implementing the experiment and the person involved in the experiment are not aware of each other. So there will be no bias in the experimental treatment.
The reliability in the double-blind experiment is improved. Under this experiment unintentional tipping off the study participants and biasing of the evaluation results by the researchers can be avoided.
Answer:
Yo personalmente creo que políticos debería y deben ser responsable, no debe tener ningún secreto en cuanto a su administración, y mantener etica.
Answer:
D
Explanation: Its kind of process of elimination, the Declaration of Rights was wanted by the Anti-Federalists or they would not have ratified for the Constitution, so A would've been exactly what they did not want, because the separation of powers was keeping one person from being in charge of everything. For B no one wanted that because that would have not been good for a new country economically. And for C the reason they were making a constitution would be so there would be no King.
